<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogger.com Deleting Urban Blogs Again</title>
	<link>http://sandrarose.com/2008/05/09/blogger-deleting-urban-blogs-again/</link>
	<description>YOUR MOM'S FAVORITE BLOGGER</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 22:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: mediakemi</title>
		<link>http://sandrarose.com/2008/05/09/blogger-deleting-urban-blogs-again/#comment-30585</link>
		<dc:creator>mediakemi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 03:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sandrarose.com/2008/05/09/blogger-deleting-urban-blogs-again/#comment-30585</guid>
		<description>Nothing wrong with Blogger. After 4 years of using it, you learn not to mess with copyright. For those of you that got that e-mail yesterday, I got one too. Blogger deleted all posts with the PEOPLE magazine cover of Mariah and Nick's wedding. PEOPLE threathened to sue them for infringement.Stop posting leaked tracks. Go out and buy the CD!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing wrong with Blogger. After 4 years of using it, you learn not to mess with copyright. For those of you that got that e-mail yesterday, I got one too. Blogger deleted all posts with the PEOPLE magazine cover of Mariah and Nick&#8217;s wedding. PEOPLE threathened to sue them for infringement.Stop posting leaked tracks. Go out and buy the CD!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandra Rose</title>
		<link>http://sandrarose.com/2008/05/09/blogger-deleting-urban-blogs-again/#comment-30504</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandra Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 00:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sandrarose.com/2008/05/09/blogger-deleting-urban-blogs-again/#comment-30504</guid>
		<description>@ Necole:

That blog will be deleted too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Necole:</p>
<p>That blog will be deleted too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Necole Bitchie</title>
		<link>http://sandrarose.com/2008/05/09/blogger-deleting-urban-blogs-again/#comment-30497</link>
		<dc:creator>Necole Bitchie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 23:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sandrarose.com/2008/05/09/blogger-deleting-urban-blogs-again/#comment-30497</guid>
		<description>Blak Music First got deleted too and a squatter got it. Now he's on blakmusicfirst2.blogspot.com.  all i can do is shake my head..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blak Music First got deleted too and a squatter got it. Now he&#8217;s on blakmusicfirst2.blogspot.com.  all i can do is shake my head..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandra Rose</title>
		<link>http://sandrarose.com/2008/05/09/blogger-deleting-urban-blogs-again/#comment-30494</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandra Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 23:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sandrarose.com/2008/05/09/blogger-deleting-urban-blogs-again/#comment-30494</guid>
		<description>brwnsugga4you Says:

so sandra the url’s are not protected in anyway???

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

No, your URL is not protected.  If you delete your blog or it gets deleted, your URL goes back into the pool of available names for anyone to get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>brwnsugga4you Says:</p>
<p>so sandra the url’s are not protected in anyway???</p>
<p>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~</p>
<p>No, your URL is not protected.  If you delete your blog or it gets deleted, your URL goes back into the pool of available names for anyone to get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ATLien</title>
		<link>http://sandrarose.com/2008/05/09/blogger-deleting-urban-blogs-again/#comment-30412</link>
		<dc:creator>ATLien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 19:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sandrarose.com/2008/05/09/blogger-deleting-urban-blogs-again/#comment-30412</guid>
		<description>Wow...that's eff'd up!  I never used Blooger, and now I know why. :-?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230;that&#8217;s eff&#8217;d up!  I never used Blooger, and now I know why. <img src='http://sandrarose.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_confused.gif' alt=':-?' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brwnsugga4you</title>
		<link>http://sandrarose.com/2008/05/09/blogger-deleting-urban-blogs-again/#comment-30404</link>
		<dc:creator>brwnsugga4you</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 19:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sandrarose.com/2008/05/09/blogger-deleting-urban-blogs-again/#comment-30404</guid>
		<description>so sandra the url's are not protected in anyway???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so sandra the url&#8217;s are not protected in anyway???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlwaysSweet</title>
		<link>http://sandrarose.com/2008/05/09/blogger-deleting-urban-blogs-again/#comment-30401</link>
		<dc:creator>AlwaysSweet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 19:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sandrarose.com/2008/05/09/blogger-deleting-urban-blogs-again/#comment-30401</guid>
		<description>the old project scoop has nothing but porn on it now. Smh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the old project scoop has nothing but porn on it now. Smh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandra Rose</title>
		<link>http://sandrarose.com/2008/05/09/blogger-deleting-urban-blogs-again/#comment-30399</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandra Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 19:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sandrarose.com/2008/05/09/blogger-deleting-urban-blogs-again/#comment-30399</guid>
		<description>@ Anna:

the problem is the squatters who wait for popular blogs to be deleted so they can grab the URL.  By the time you find out your site is gone someone else has the URL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Anna:</p>
<p>the problem is the squatters who wait for popular blogs to be deleted so they can grab the URL.  By the time you find out your site is gone someone else has the URL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2bme</title>
		<link>http://sandrarose.com/2008/05/09/blogger-deleting-urban-blogs-again/#comment-30396</link>
		<dc:creator>2bme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 19:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sandrarose.com/2008/05/09/blogger-deleting-urban-blogs-again/#comment-30396</guid>
		<description>considering everyone knows how blogger is.this comes as no surprise to me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>considering everyone knows how blogger is.this comes as no surprise to me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://sandrarose.com/2008/05/09/blogger-deleting-urban-blogs-again/#comment-30392</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 19:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sandrarose.com/2008/05/09/blogger-deleting-urban-blogs-again/#comment-30392</guid>
		<description>@Bird 

If the bloggers know that playing leaked tracks could lead to their demise, why would they do it? I can’t feel bad for them.


Some ppl will take their chances I guess.
If you know how to reset it it only cost you time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bird </p>
<p>If the bloggers know that playing leaked tracks could lead to their demise, why would they do it? I can’t feel bad for them.</p>
<p>Some ppl will take their chances I guess.<br />
If you know how to reset it it only cost you time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
