And side note. Everybody makes mistakes. Everybody didn’t have a good life growing. Some harder than others. Some of go thru ish, some of us go thru ish harder than others. What she’s going to tell her child, is her business, and no one else. This can for we know, make her a better mother. Cuz trust, I child who grew up in good stable situation wouldn’t of been out looking for love (lust) in the arms of an older wealthy man. I’m not holding anything against anyone who did something like this when they were a child, probably going thru who knows what at home. An adult like R. Kelly now……he should be totally responsible. He was the ADULT (and mean that with more than age), and he knew exactly what he was doing.

On cross-examination, R. Kelly’s attorney Sam Adam Sr. is attempting to paint Lisa Van Allen as a liar and a thief.
Adam got Van Allen to admit that she had relationships with two men convicted for fraud in the federal courts. One - Damon Pryor - is the so-called “mystery witness” who flew into town at the last minute last week. He’s the father of Van Allen’s child. The other man - Yul Brown - is Van Allen’s current partner.
Under questioning from Adam, Van Allen said that she knew Pryor had served time for fraud before they met in 2001. She also knew Brown was a fraudster, she said.
She laughed when Adam asked her if she only dated men with federal fraud convictions.
While they were together, Pryor told her “how you interject yourself into a case - that you go at the last minute” with important testimony, she said. Van Allen agreed with Adam that Pryor was a “conman,” describing their relationship as “a mistake.”
Adam pointed out that Van Allen had not come forward for nearly five-and-a-half years as a witness against Kelly, suggesting a link between Pryor’s advice and her late emergence as a witness.
But Van Allen denied telling Pryor that the tape at the center of the case was a fake, or that she had told him she planned to extort cash from Kelly. She denied telling a Minnesota woman the same thing, also denying that she knew two men called “Chuck and Keith” had staged the tape at the center of the case to get money from Kelly.
The Minnesota woman, Lena Prado, has not been mentioned in court before, but Van Allen said she had known her since 1999. Van Allen denied having a sexual relationship with Prado.
Van Allen did admit to stealing Kelly’s $20,000 Rolex from his hotel room. Asked why she had never admitted stealing the watch until today, she said, “That’s not what (R. Kelly’s) on trial for.”
She acknowledged that her current partner, Brown, had been sentenced to probation for a weapons conviction just two weeks after she eventually approached prosecutors, offering to testify against Kelly. But she denied that prosecutors had told her they “needed” her to take the stand. Brown had faced up to 22 years for possessing a loaded AK-47 machine gun, Adam said.
============================================================
This all boils down to one thing and is that she & her fiance got greedy and wanted more money. You can’t make hoe into a housewife. Which she clearly is!!!!

And if this is true didn’t she break the law as well?

When I was age 14-18, I always had men trying to holla and most of them were definitely between age 18-25.

Now that I’m older, I find it disguisting on a pedophile level..

But, when I was that age - I wasn’t even trippen.

R.Kelly knew better.. He has a history of preying on young girls. Lock his ass up!