Comments on: Update: Judge rules reporter will not have to testify

By: kitty4shigady

kitty4shigady — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 14:29:49 +0000

I know what is going on his ass is guitly and needs to fry bottom line anybody who is supporting him is just as sick and twisted as he is and they need they ass kicked too

By: AugustTee

AugustTee — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 23:27:45 +0000

Like I said, if you knew what was really going on here, most people would never read, listen to music or watch another movie again. You would be surprised what can be created with technology. The person nehind this has enough money to see serious damage done and is willing to spend it to make it happen. That person speaks frequently of the ignorance or men and women and how the public can be easily lead by photos and film. Like I said they are LAOF

By: SnootyPooty1

SnootyPooty1 — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 21:03:09 +0000

@kitty4shigady… My sentiments exactly

By: kitty4shigady

kitty4shigady — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 17:42:56 +0000

well i saw the tape and is ass is guilty regarldess of what people are saying about the trial being he say she say the jury saw the tape when the trial first started and you can see his ass on the tape you can see his soul train award on his desk and the fools answer when somebody calls out for him and i am sorry that is that girl on that tape and her parents need they ass kicked for not saying it is not her it is too many people that has testified that it is her and him on the tape. the chick who had the threesome may have tried to get money out of the perv for his silence I don’t care about that, that just proves that there is something for her to be slient about he bought back the tape from her that she had of them so if he is buying back tapes to me that says right there that fool is guilty. It so many people saying it ain’t him and they have not even saw the tape, so i don’t see how they can even comment on this. I have a young daughter and i Take this shyt personal if that was my daughter I would be in jail cause i would have murdered that mf. If he gets off it just shows how ****ed the world we live in is.

By: missdisrection

missdisrection — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 17:04:05 +0000

With the latest being that a few family members (3 or 4) of the girl in question are saying “that’s not her” along with the girl herself who is saying “that’s not me” I believe Kelly is going to be acquitted. Also, the chick who spoke about the 3 way is being accused of having her boyfriend approach Kelly for $300,000 to not saying anything. I don’t see a jury convicting him because there is too much he say/she say and then the witnesses for the prosecution have severe credibility issues. I mean the defense did a good job and the circumstantial evidence was powerful but with these family members/ the girl in question and the dark video, I don’t see him getting convicted; maybe a mistrial. If I were on the jury, I would most likely say “not guilty”; not because I didn’t believe he did the act but because we are talking about a man’s life and it’s one thing to be on a blog saying what you would do verses actually being a juror who has the fate of this man’s life in your hands with shaky evidence. For me, I would need the girl to say “yes, it’s me.” Or I would need her parents to say, “yes, that is our child.” But when you have the girl saying “no” with some family members saying “no” and some family members saying “yes”, with shady witnesses and a dark video I personally would not be able to convict. I mean, the judicial system is flawed but it’s what we have and for it to maintain some integrity, you can’t convict someone on your gut; strong evidence has to support it. Why? Because you or I could be sitting in a cell for something we did not do (like some already are) but because someone had a “gut” feeling, we are locked up.

By: AugustTee

AugustTee — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 00:31:18 +0000

Sorry wrong again, they tried to extort money from Kells at least twice. They made physical threats. These things were not done because of the knowledge of some tape. This is about money, contracts, people that want to drive nice cars and be “like the Jones”. They used Sparkle as the front person because one of them stated publicly along time ago “Sparkle, she’s a stupid B, she will do anything for money. This people that were so concerned and felt like they were doing the right thing, originally wanted money and record deals. There is money behind this entire thing. This is not the doings of some ordinary Joe, they just used some other people as fronts. That person is watching this like a comedy show. That person has enough money to make movies, albums, etc. Some of the actors of this play won’t get their final check unless Kells goes down.

By: MzDetermined

MzDetermined — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 21:12:35 +0000

^^^^^ Amen!!!!!

By: ELove

ELove — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 20:25:51 +0000

The reason it’s so involved is because this isn’t a Simple-case to prosecute… Kelly didn’t get these teenage-girls by himself w/o anybody’s knowledge or assistance. He Needed ALOT of F–king-Help to help Con-These-Hot-Girls!!!

So as far as I’m concerned Kelly is WRONG
All-of-His-Inner-circle are Wrong
Sparkle setting her Cuz-out is WRONG
Everybody that had a Hand-in-this is WRONG

By: milly

milly — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 20:18:22 +0000

^^^lol

By: Bubbles

Bubbles — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 19:38:33 +0000

Off topic: Why are all of Sandra’s readers “loyal readers” ?

Can’t they just be “readers” or “occasional readers” maybe even “random readers” ?

Okay…back to your regular scheduled programming.