FanMAIL: Are SR Cliques Scaring Newbies Away?

Some time ago, we busted up a few cliques in the comments and deleted the worst offenders who then went down the road to hurl rocks at us from someone else’s yard. It was all good. For a while things were quiet around here.

But now it seems the cliques have formed again with new ringleaders. My regular readers are noticing a disturbing trend.

Loyal reader Kendhra writes:

Hey Sandra!!!

I know there are a million folks who can replace anyone who decides to never come back, but what rings out to me is the respect that posters should show for YOUR business. The support, respect, and appreciation for being able to post a blog on your site should be kept in mind at all times. That is YOUR blog, and sometimes I feel people get a little carried away when they lash out at other posters because of what they don’t know or like/dislike.

But here are some examples;

    * Charles Says:
    Who the **** are these random people who stan for random artists
    Isn’t registration closed??

    * KaraZ Says:
    Charles I’m with you (scary thought). Who left the momofuking gates open?

If I’m taking this too seriously, let me know. It’s just irritating to see this happen so much, because I feel bad for the newer people posting who will read these types of comments. I’m not the spokesperson for the people, but this is pretty bitter.

Thanks!


 


203 Responses to “FanMAIL: Are SR Cliques Scaring Newbies Away?”

  1. 1
    trynabeme says:

    Yep….you’re taking it too seriously. I’m more of a lurker than a poster. Which is why I know the “attitudes” of SOME of the posters…..

    PHUCK ‘EM GURL, PHUCK ‘EM….LMAO

    At best it can be considered rude…but if that’s the case, getcho peeps to sign up (when registration is open) and yall clique up too:-)

  2. 2
    Charles says:

    Lfnmsjrhyujeikw234rhjkyu4rih2367yu4werisdrfg34tyh78ui2wsdrgh3u

    Ok first of all there are no cliques sandra why entertain that foolishness the only reason I said this is because twice I have seen random commenters with no avatars who pop up and say they know or are stans of whoever and then disappear all of a sudden and im confused as to who or why???

    And me and karaz as a clique you can’t be serious…..

  3. 3

    Let the drama began and I for one feel once the new people came the drama came. I can’t even post my opinion without people name calling me, I’ve been a member a long time now and it’s never been that way. So is it the old people are the new people? I’m just saying…

  4. 4
    LovelyLady says:

    :rofl: I have been here for over 2 years about 3 before this was a .com and was a blogspot.com. lol. I love my SR fam even the newbies. Stop scaring them away yall lol.

  5. 5
    RachelRachel says:

    Well, I did read what KaraZ & Charles wrote and thought to myself, “they’re immature; no need to defend or comment to either of them”. So, I didn’t. Thanks Kendhra for reading My Mind. More Power To You & Sandra!

  6. 6
    2thick4u says:

    Okay…I’m lost…I guess the cliques were formed and disbanned while I was still locked out at work :( !!!

    I wish a mutha______ would get upset about a comment I posted that was my opinion.

    This has never happened to me so I can’t relate but if and when it does…trust you will know…CAUSE I WILL SHUT THIS MUTHA______ DOWN :shotsfired: (don’t run now)!!!!

  7. 7
  8. 8
    LovelyLady says:

    @ Nichelle,

    That is sooooooooo true. We never had any of that before but as soon as Sandra opens registrations, the ones who be lurking sign up and show off in a dis tasteful way.

    We say take that ish to them trashy azz sites.

  9. 9
    Shalala26 says:

    yes i am first to say sandra u do have some rude people that like to comment about people they want to know,but have no idea, i understand that opinions are like assholes and everybody has one, i have to agree with Kendhra on this one, lol!!!

  10. 10
    trynabeme says:

    And unless I missed something….registration has been closed FOR MONTHS…..so who is NEW?????

    BTW Sanrda….my cousin is hurt about the “only work email addys” rule….she works for a small medical (not pharmaceutical-LOL) company & so they have att.net email addresses…..she says, “LEMME IN!”

  11. 11
    2bme says:

    But it also doesn’t help that yo have people on here rooting for the nonsense..i can’t wait for such and such..why? Is your life that bad that you can’t wait for someone to get on the board and tear down another human being? I been w/SR before she made this a blog and left CL because of the same nature of foolishness..get it together..I can understand why it would scare people away..

  12. 12
    LovelyLady says:

    I miss Kymesrty and so many of the OLD crew.

  13. 13
    starr says:

    Now…i been posting here for a loooooong time. And I think this person is reading waaaayyy too much into it. This is a blog filled with soo many different opionions. There are gonna be disagreements, and e-fights. The problem is some peopl take someone disagreeing w/ them personal. And that is the problem i’ve found wit newbies. It seems liek there are cliques cuz most of us been posting here for a long time. Its not that serious. Fo real

  14. 14
    Shalala26 says:

    @ 2 what do it matter to u?????? please give me a break!! ****blank stare*****

  15. 15
    KayCeiSoul says:

    ROTFLMAO @ 2thick4u !!!! Girl you are crayyy-seee.

  16. 16
    missy says:

    Why are some people so sensitive this is just a blog everyone is entitled to their own opinion and just because you agree with someone doesn’t mean your in a clique.I’ve been accused of being in a click because i agree with what some has said.

    STOP CATCHING FEELINGS

  17. 17
    starr says:

    I miss seeing kym post too. And honestly i’ve liked some of the new people i’ve seen posting. I don’t know what this person is talkin about. Other than that post from about a week ago..the 115 prgnant chicks….this have been rather good. And i remember when there were e-wars going on the comment section lol

  18. 18
    2thick4u says:

    Damn…I guess I never really read the comments if they aren’t my own and if some1 doesn’t direct a comment to me because I didn’t know that is was this bad :confused:

    I also have been a ride or die SR member that was down before this site and even be4 the blogspot.com…so I can’t be ran away :shotsfired1:

  19. 19
    artistman999 says:

    To much Ralph Tresvant going on…

  20. 20
    starr says:

    just saw an example of what i’m talkin bout…..

  21. 21
    PAGESINADIARY says:

    ON SANDRAROSE.COM YOU ARE EITHER GONNA BAR B Q, OR MILDEW. NOW WHICH ONE IS IT GOING TO BE FOR YOU?

  22. 22
    Krysi J says:

    oh I see Im just in time, for a good one

    *sits back to laugh a little longer*

    hold up… :rofl:

  23. 23
    PAGESINADIARY says:

    @ARTISTMAN999 I AM ROTFLOL

  24. 24

    I need a list of the little people I need to start posting some

  25. 25
    missmiami says:

    lol @ 18. i agree with the person who sent the email. it’s funny though because i don’t see some of the ring leaders in hear now. anyway, i love me some sandrarose.com

  26. 26

    Charles, if you’re reading this. That was your third strike homie. I still got love for you though. :cya: :cry:

  27. 27
    LovelyLady says:

    @ Starr

    I agree. Everyone has different opinions, meaning people are bound to clash and disagree. However you have some posters who take things personally because in some shape or form they feel like what ur saying is directed towards them and it hits a soft spot.

  28. 28
    mizzdallas says:

    GTFOH! there are NO cliques, we are grown azz professional people just bypassing time as we post our mofo opionions lurkers take shyt too personal we welcome any and everybody to sr! its not that serious shyt heck if you want 2 get technical and I want say the blog name but it ends in bitchie that post up 500 comments and 30 comments is about the damn post. Most of the sr fam have twitter accounts so we do know some individuals more then others but thats NOT cliquish. I say grow phuck up this is NOT high school…

    And sandra while you posting on BS lets talk about posters disrepecting your loyal readers, you know calling us bishes n shyt lets stop that shyt phuck what kenhra is sayin…

  29. 29
    Daisy says:

    :popcorn:

    As a mbr of the welcome commitee here at SR I welcome all the newbies with open arms :hug: now I try to stay away from e fights cause its really not that serious I stans for ppl n FUN I don’t lose sleep ova anything said on this blog! With that being said I feel this was just a set up by the enemy (I kid I kid) trying to get you to clean house again and open registration. I know when I use to lurk I cldnt wait to be able to post and come at the Bey stans (hey Iyona and Hermosa *smooches*) but again all n FUN. I have seen an increase n name calling and ppl throw rocks then want to hide hands and become the “victim”

    Sorry that was so long lol

  30. 30

    sandra you are banning charles where will we get are laughs “sandra don’t do it”

  31. 31
    LovelyLady says:

    @ Sandra *side eye* , you ban Charles for a while and bring him right back. Just like a year ago when he was first banned. Buthey, i might not agree with Charles but I look forward to his posts. They make the board alive.

  32. 32
    2bme says:

    Damn Sandra you must have his comments moderated..aww well…THANKYOU!!!Next time I am in the A i will take you to lunch!

  33. 33
    starr says:

    what charles did…..lol

    Where we pose to get our lols

  34. 34

    what did charles do?

  35. 35
  36. 36
    2thick4u says:

    KayCeiSoul Says:

    ROTFLMAO @ 2thick4u !!!! Girl you are crayyy-seee
    ____________________________________________________________

    Girl I am serious…after reading people comments it seems that people are getting ran off due to getting called out on comments…this ain’t no debate site, this is a blog.

    Post an opinion and move on…don’t be rude and start ****ing with people :argue: !!!

    DISCLAIMER: If you don’t like 2thick4u comments…please respect my opinion and respectfully agree to disagree but don’t be rude cause I would hate to **** YOU UP :thumbsup:

  37. 37
    masonmom says:

    do i consider myself a newbie? i think im an old head by now, lol. as far as the clique’s we pretty much agree and disagree with each other all the time! MAN UP BYTCH!! :danban:

  38. 38
    LovelyLady says:

    *dead* at Mizz Dallas

    “you know calling us bishes n shyt lets stop that shyt phuck what kenhra is sayin…”

    ^^ this is why i love ya :hug:

  39. 39
    pointhimout says:

    i see what she’s saying, but it’s a blog and not that serious. i haven’t been attacked, so maybe that’s ezier for me to say. i didn’t realize there were clicks either.

    lol @ #26. wow.

  40. 40
    Daisy says:

    Charles I guess that was a :nono: God Bless and Good luck

    So what makes a clique cause you agree with somebody..REALLY..ARE U SERIOUS (n my best Neffie voice)

    CHILE BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

  41. 41
    starr says:

    @lovelady

    I’ll never understand why anyone takes it so personal. Wen i turn off my computer….its forgotten…but some people seem to take it soo serious…smh

  42. 42
    missy says:

    Don’t ban charles I need his smart remarks they brighten up my day lol and this doesn’t make you a pathetic person because you’re waiting on someone else commentary.

  43. 43
    BLACKBARBIE404 says:

    IMMA OLDHEAD TOO AND I HAVE TWO WORDS…

    C’MON SON!

    LMAO

  44. 44
    LilMissRed says:

    oh wow! like THAT?? Ive been coming to this site for a couple yrs if not longer(??) and I admit I lurk more than I post, but geesh if u find urself catchin feelings… DONT READ THE COMMENTS. it CANT be THAT hard, no????? just check out the pics/headings and keep it moving. Personally I think the comments can be ‘comical’ to say the least but thats just my opinion and EVERYONE has a right to share their opinion.. if u dont agree with it.. kick bricks.. move on.. geesh!

    ps… doesnt seem like ppl are fighting to get outta here.. more so fighting to get in.. whats that tell u???

  45. 45
    2bme says:

    This blog used to have an adult vibe to it..and then children, followers and attention whores were let in..bring back the old SR..you can still be entertaining without being malicious about EVERYTHING

  46. 46
    Daisy says:

    @LilMiss :cosign: and I been meaning to tell you that is a FIERCE pic!

    :rofl: @blackbarbie I love when Ryan plays that Ed Lover clip

  47. 47
    melinla says:

    logged in after a 5 day pause for the flu and this is what I come back to???

  48. 48
    anti-PC says:

    Hmmmm…..I roll solo.

    I prefer it that way.

  49. 49
    pinky2083 says:

    Dayum Sandra you banning Charles? I didn’t think it was that serious.

    I’ve been on here going on two years I beleive…

    I’m never rude to the new people. I thought you weren’t accepting new people anyway.

  50. 50
    masonmom says:

    noooo wait, what did charles do sandy? i missed it. he was just defending himself from that overly sensitive newbie **starting to cry** i feel like james just died from Good Times…aww naw dnt take charles away from me…DMN-DMN-DMN!!!!

    SEE WHAT U DID U SNITCHIN NEWBIE…i need u charles..please sandy :snort:

  51. 51
  52. 52
    rjk8 says:

    Sandra,

    Open it up to everyone. Yeah, you will get a few bad but the good will more than out weigh the few bad. And, I always like different points of view on issues it makes the comment section more interesting. Just my opinion.

  53. 53
    Shauny says:

    O.K hold up hold up…I’ve only scanned through the comments on this post but Charles is banned, there are cliques, etc. I’ll be back after reading ALL of the comments….carry on

  54. 54
    ELove says:

    @BB … Whaddup Boo !!!

    And I’m an OLD-HEAD also AND Why does 90% of the posters that AGREE with the clique-comment have YT-Crying baby avatars ???
    (Hmmmmmmmmmmmm…) :lol:

    And TOTALLY AGREE with @2bme (#45)… Bring BACK the Real !!!

  55. 55
    Krysi J says:

    ok ok ok……… :rofl: ……….first let me ask, to the LOYAL readers and posters of Sandra Rose…..what da hell yall up in heRR doing to deez newbies man? ..LMAO

    Second

    who in fukk gotta a click in THIS mF?? I believe I have fallin out and fallin back in with almost everyone I holla at on the daily in SR….we couldn’t click up in dis shyt if we wanted to!! :rofl:

    Hell naw, have that. Ya betta have thick skin or better yet a THICK SCREEN if ya wanna post in this site sweetie, we ain thanking bout yo feelings and ain nobody thinking bout ours either. PROBABLY becuz its a damn WEBSITE!

    dismissed.

  56. 56
    missy says:

    @LilMiss

    :cosign:

    If people are being so mean then why are a lot of people trying to get on here.

    @manson

    :lolol:

  57. 57

    Sandra Charles just lost focus because there coming at his neck. U can’t ban the Mike Epps of Sandra Rose noooooooooooo

  58. 58
    Daisy says:

    @Anti- we ALL roll solo! If a “clique” is agreeing with somebody then you are in a clique as well cause I know I have seen you agree with something somebody has said before although it may not happen often it has happened :wink:

    Anybody else need some more :popcorn:

  59. 59
    LilMissRed says:

    @46, thanks Daisy!

  60. 60

    All Charles wanted to do is make us laugh who cares he only likes Brandy I like her to….

  61. 61
    anti-PC says:

    Daisy,

    I disagree.

    A clique is a group of people constantly around each other, co-signing for each other non-stop and ganging up on others.

    Agreeing once or twice with an individual does not mean you are in a clique.

  62. 62
    missy says:

    @Krysi J

    :preach:

    and I agree with elove…… oh yea I have been on this site when you weren’t even allowed to comment and I use to lurk a lot but since I can finally remember my password(every time I log in)

  63. 63
    luvly1957 says:

    Dang bye Charles, I’m really going to miss u and I agree wit da majority it’s a blog and since when we can’t voice ur opinion I thought that was wat da comment section waz for. And clicks, just cuz u speak to someone u see online all da time makes it a click, in that case HI KENDHRA now we are clickin!!!

  64. 64
    LovelyLady says:

    ALL THIS TRASH TALKING, NAME CALLING ISH HAS RUBBED OFF ON US FROM READING SANDRROSE TOOOOOOOO MUCH. WE HAVE ADOPTED SANDRAS PERSONALITY. :lol:

  65. 65
    starr says:

    honestly….we’ve had what soem would say are cliques waaayy back. I don’t think this person is really payin attention, either that or they are reading too much into things.

  66. 66
    Daisy says:

    @anti I agree and I know what a real clique is as well that is why I said IF a “clique”..I was being funny because ppl are being accused of being in a clique just because they agree and you said you roll solo like we all dont. If I agree with somebody else I agree I dont worry about that making it seem like I am in a clique or what have you. It aint that deep to me lol

  67. 67
    wiggy2272003 says:

    Sandra Please don’t ban Charles. I can’t imagine he would have disrespected you.
    E-cliques really?
    Yes you are.
    Dead at the tattletaling
    I think Sandra keeps an eye and when the convo heads past debate to personal disrespect shes on top of it.

    MS Dallas who called who bishes?

  68. 68
    masonmom says:

    where are the cliques/mean girls? last i checked im located in pg county, md and everybody else is where ever! its not like we sittin in class teasin n clowning folks, wow! i mean really, MAN UP! life isnt fair so get over it. who and why do people get mad over cyber talk?

  69. 69
    candycane says:

    You’re taking it too seriously, it’s a blog

  70. 70
    2bme says:

    correct Starr..the cliques were there in the beginning…not so much now

  71. 71
    trynabeme says:

    luvly1957 Says:

    in that case HI KENDHRA now we are clickin!!!
    ————————————————-
    ROTFLMAO

  72. 72
    LovelyLady says:

    @ MASONMOM

    ‘last i checked im located in pg county, md”

    I GUESS THAT WOULD MAKE ME AND U A CLICK CAUSE I LIVE IN OG COUNTY, MD TO :lol: *DC Stand Up*

  73. 73
    LovelyLady says:

    Typo *Pg County

  74. 74
    starr says:

    anyhoo…i got one more course for the day. Hope no one gets locked out…lol

  75. 75
    masonmom says:

    why are we even still feeding into this anymore, where’s the next post? isnt ri-ri rockin another hair do or somethin?

  76. 76
    Anna says:

    Was I working so hard that this post is already at 71 comments or did this just stir up folks to let their fingers do the walking. Going to scroll up and read the comments

  77. 77
    Shauny says:

    o.k here’s my .02. I’m with Nichelle and a few others who said that some people came out of the woodwork straight disrespecting people on here. Name calling, labeling, etc. We use to be able to argue on here without name calling one day and it would be back to normal the next. That is no longer the case. People keep their little beefs and name calling going on and on. There are also poster who ONLY come on when there is a topic that they know beef will occur (such as this one) to make little remarks hoping that someone will bite.

    I lurked for months before Sandra let me in way back when so I was here when the original banning happened and when Charles was banned twice.

    I’ve been on here for a minute and I can count on 1 hand how many times I’ve gotten into it with someone and like I said even when we do at the end of the day it’s a blog and we’re cool the next day. I don’t come on here to argue, I come on here for fun. I think that’s how it’s supposed to be.

    What defines a clique exactly? I know I’m a woman who holds her own weight BUT I also know that I talk to other posters on here on a daily because they’re on here ON A DAILY. Am I in a clique?

    A clique IMO is when someone is going at it with someone other posters are all ganging up on this other person. I haven’t seen that since Mullet :rofl: so did I miss it?

  78. 78
    kcicero says:

    :popcorn: If you can’t take the heat get out of the kitchen….

  79. 79
    bk2atl says:

    I think that you have certain types of posters on EVERY blog. You have the “occasional” posters. You have the “loud mouths”, you have the ones that feel COMPELLED to comment on EVERY single post, you have the ones that will disagree with you just for the sake of disagreeing. Fact of the matter is, these different personalities exist in REAL LIFE as well…that’s just life.

  80. 80
    Krysi J says:

    Hell then adding to luvly’s comment

    does that mean all the newbies who agree with Kendhra are in a clique now?? Shyt the should be…in da SACC = soft az cotton crew.

  81. 81
    keely107 says:

    Taking IT too serious! How u clique up on-line? How do u bully someone on-line when they can just LOG OFF? LMAO! Lord, how do some people survive in the REAL world being so sensitive?

  82. 82
    Daisy says:

    KC u sound like AM

    Shauny well said :clap: damn does this mean we are a click since I co signed what u just said :lol:

  83. 83
    kcicero says:

    by the way, :cya: charles, I’m really going to miss ya commentary. I like Brandy to by the way….”Just Falllll, don’t be afraid, cause I’m on my wayyyyy”

  84. 84
    pointhimout says:

    78 comments…..seriously? really?

  85. 85
    2thick4u says:

    @bk2atl…well spoken… :cosign:

  86. 86
    iyonah says:

    Sooner or later , I knew this was coming.

    When I first started commentin, I did think the commentors were “cliquish” that old to the “kona” irked my nerves. It doesn’t mean in any way that it impacted me posting. I continued on with my .02,Bey stanning & typos. You think I would really stop visiting or not posting because of another? If anything “work” and the actual post will prevent a comment, but never a person TYPING the same as me. I recall being on the Melo/Lala post round the time he was locked up and people were playing teams. HOWEVER, it in no way caused me to leave the site. I came here via MissInfo and I log in from NJ daily and if I miss a day, I make it up the next day. The one thing I respect about you SR is that you interact with your readers and you allow a colorful rainbow of people to comment. Eliminating Charles is taking the red from the rainbow SR, the comments he & karaz made were not that bad. Trust me … if you refer to other post, they were at a 2 on a 10 scale.

  87. 87
    kcicero says:

    “KC u sound like AM”

    >:( that ain’t right daisy why you got to be name calling… :lol:

  88. 88
    dblaq says:

    Do people really take internet comments serious?????? I think of it more as entertainment because ain’t no telling who is real, who is fake, who is brave behind a keyboard. Most of the time people will say sh!t on the internet that they would NEVER dare tell someone in the face.

  89. 89
    Shauny says:

    Sandra, did Charles say something that you didn’t post or was he banned for comment #2? He was one of my regular debaters. I looked forward to disagreeing with him. Dang Charles!

    I guess I have to save some of my :preach: and :cosign: and ^5 so I wont be mistaken for being in a click…SMH

    I also wont be saying Hi to anyone…lol geez

  90. 90
    iyonah says:

    Cosign 2beme @ 70, theywere def here ONLINE as they are in real LIFE, my take isto take it as a grain of sale, its only words.

  91. 91
    artistman999 says:

    @Krysi J Says: SACC…. I just literally LOL at that comment…people in the office R asking me what is so funny. I mean like other’s on here have said. It’s all fun and entertaining, if you agree with someone agree, if not voice your opinion and keep it moving. At some point we all were lurker’s like myself. I have been reading SR for a long time and I have not seem people clique up. ” I wonder since the majority of us are saying we don’t click or we roll solol does that make us a clique” LOL

  92. 92
    pinky2083 says:

    Where is Kendhra?????

  93. 93
    iyonah says:

    I meant cosign @2beme @ 70, as it was really cliqu round these parts.

    :cosign: @bk2atl theywere def here ONLINE as they are in real LIFE, my take isto take it as a grain of sale, its only words here though, hence it mattering much less!

  94. 94
    pinky2083 says:

    :cosign: @ Iyonah, that Kona shyt used to get on my nerves too!! :)

  95. 95
    Daisy says:

    Iyonah I like sending ppl 2 the KONA I thought that was cute :shrug:

    KC :lol: my bad no more “name calling”

    Krysi TO the KONA for soft as cotton crew :rofl:

  96. 96
    2bme says:

    I could be wrong but I don’t think Sandra banned Charles on the comment he posted on here..it was a comment he was TRYING to post that did it.

  97. 97
    Shauny says:

    Damnit Chuckles….singing This Is For My Homies at my cubicle…why, why, why?

  98. 98

    u guys are funny, i dont know how i would get through my work day with out you.

    charles u will be missed :hug:

  99. 99

    Kendhra see what u done did?? DAMN :mad:

  100. 100
    SunnyPA says:

    Okay, I’m late today and just getting on.

    I’ve been a member since January. I’ve always noticed cliques. Initially, I wasn’t bothered because it was all in fun. A few months ago, it seemed like more of the comments became mean-spirited. There’s a difference between being hard on someone and just being mean.

    @Sandra
    You know how I feel when commenters attack you viciously. If it were my blog a whole lot of commenters would be gone. lol

    On the other hand, I’m not as committed to blogging as some of you are…more comments, more hits. So, my blog value is not as great. So, I can’t say which is better.

    I’ve noticed that the comment flow has been different the past week … more friendly…. at least, I thought.

    (boss walked in … gotta run)

  101. 101
    Krysi J says:

    Yea, come on Sandra this post is dead now tell them newbies graduation is every 3 months if they wanna attended the school of SR that bad…since we back in school clicking ans shyt…prepare to be hazed young sacc members..

    ooh can we make up nicknames and give’em a hard time until Charles lets them cross over….

    aw dAMN……chARLES!!!! NOOOOOOOOooooo!

  102. 102
    coaretained says:

    :cosign: /”cliquing” up with shauny… right on the money.

    As far as the mullet days… *snicker* them were the good old days. She was one of those rock throwers that hid their hands someone mentioned.

    BUT AT THE END OF THE DAY…(preach Neffeterria)

    It’s just the internet. Don’t nobody gotta come up in here caplocking and keyboard banging.

    Word.

  103. 103
    free says:

    i have to agree w/charles (#2). i think i remember when he posted that and the context was that, as soon as sandra posts about someone none of us in the ATL knows about, a person comes out of the woodwork and says they were good friends w/the person, yada yada yada.

    SANDRA, PLEASE DONT DELETE ME BUT I DON’T THINK THE COMPLAINANT KNEW THE CONTEXT OF HIS POST.

    i’ve been on maybe 2 years and i think there is some familiarity between posters that leads people to believe there are cliques but i don’t check for it that much to have noticed anything.

  104. 104
    iyonah says:

    Sandra

    Seriously… Charles has been alot better AND if he is going out at least let it bewith a BANG. The quote in the email isn’t banworthy IMO.

  105. 105
    SunnyPA says:

    Just going through the comments (boss walked out)…

    Charles was hard but not mean-spirited. I liked his comments.

  106. 106
    LovelyLady says:

    OMG @ Krysi :rofl: u a damn fool gurllllllll

    “does that mean all the newbies who agree with Kendhra are in a clique now?? Shyt the should be…in da SACC = soft az cotton crew”

    But that would make them into a click i guess :shrug:

  107. 107

    Dang…what i miss??? aw i like charles!

  108. 108
    free says:

    bk2atl said it well in #79. i gotta go but i hope charles comes back. WHO’S GONNA DRAG FOR EVERYBODY??? lol.

  109. 109
    LovelyLady says:

    Daisy Says:

    Iyonah I like sending ppl 2 the KONA I thought that was cute
    ——-

    We been doing that for years and i thought it was cute to. its all in fun.

  110. 110
    missy says:

    Charles was banned I think over the comment he made in the Toya post about Rasheeda.(that comment was mean but funny)But Sandra you can’t ban Charles he dragged Trey through the mud for you girl lol any way i’ll be on the look out for Charles smart remarks in the future. :waiting:

  111. 111
    wiggy2272003 says:

    @Ionah, I found this site through missinfo( the only other blog I comment on) too. Great minds….
    Sandra not to take away from you but you know the comments are one of the main reasons this blog is so popular. And how you keep registration closed keeps the family closer and keeps from the other blogs with hundreds of comments half of them are idiotic and so who really reads through them?

  112. 112
    Shauny says:

    free EXACTLY…that’s why I would like to know what the TRUE definition is of a clique to them.

    Since we talk about other shows (SYTYCD, Nip/Tuck, etc) and have off topic converstations does that mean Daisy and I are in a clique? Since missy now talks about SYTYCD with us now…are we a menage clique?

    Since Isc asked and we purchased her book and want to talk about her book when we’re done reading it are we the Iscream book club clique?

    If you laugh at Charles random rants about everything are you in a clique with Charles?

    I mean really when does it end? A click is ganging up on someone and trying to bully them IMO. I DO NOT see that on here. Being cordial and chatting with people on a blog you’ve been on for years, months whatever is the SAME way you are with your co workers…but I guess you’re in a clique then too.

    o.k lurking on this post from now on

  113. 113

    I hate to say this but….don’t ban Charles and Zara. They both come after me hard. I don’t give a ratz azz. I just tell them to sit their azzes down and shut the f*** up.

    This isn’t about newbies. The celebs are putting pressure on Sandra to shut Charles and Zara down. They both obviously are privy to inside info on celebs.

  114. 114
    keely107 says:

    @Shauny:

    If you agree with other people-clique
    Disagree-Bully
    Kona-nerve wrecking

    And there we have it!

  115. 115

    attheendoftheday (c) chris brown i dont think its that serious people disagree they diss people you like, throw out fake numbers, call people flops who not but if they came to the A and said lets go out im there. because its just your opinion on something i dnt have a personal beef with you. iscream always challenges me on a Jay Z post but i still bought her book because i dont have a personal beef with her. Yall like family away from family so if we agree or not love yall the same

  116. 116
    iscream says:

    :confused: so it was alright when Charles was draggin NB in your honor? I have gotten into it with him (in fun) a few times but I don’t think he should’ve been :ban: but its your board… that you make exclusive to post on… which makes the whole board a clique to the lurkers.

    Like Iyonah I love that Sandra also post here and I thought/think its cool that other board owners post here. I never let the beefs get to me. I have an 8 year old and he is the only one who can push those buttons.

    THANKS TO ALL MY SANDRA ROSE FAM (YES FAM) WHO SUPPORTED MY BOOK (& that’s how I thanked yall in my thank you) :hug: more of you guys supported than my real friends. & to any outsiders looking in. I don’t blame you for being mad.

    If I was you I’d hate me to.

  117. 117
    Shauny says:

    o.k I had to :lolol: @ east #attheendoftheday reference

  118. 118
    whatdoesitmatter says:

    I don’t know if I would be considered new. I’ve been a member for a few years. I just don’t post that often. I have lately because I have a little more time on my hands. Anywho, I come to find people are starting to get too sensitive. I posted my opinion on a topic last week but was them accused of being in a click. I guess she was trying to say I was trying to impose my opinions on others. Didn’t really care. Don’t care now but I think Charles is too funny to let go. He is definiely extreme but everybody has a crazy uncle in there family. He’s the crazy uncle here.

  119. 119
    SunnyPA says:

    there seems to be various definitions of clique … it’s more than just agreeing with someone.

    Remember how Toya/Tomeka’s live chat was critized as being local to the point of excluding the rest of the lurking and commenting audience?!?!? That’s what an e-clique looks like … when the blog comments become a convo between a specific group of people (on a regular basis) to the exclusion of others.

    Again, it’s only on rare occasions that I can stick around as the comments progress. I usually comment, leave, then read the comments in their entirety later. Maybe the groups don’t realize what’s happening in the moment.

    (As usual, I’ll have to read later. It’s too hard to get keep up when you’re looking over your shoulder).

  120. 120
    brwnsugga4you says:

    wow. if you blog everyday w/ppl sooner or later you start forming some sort of bonds. i don’t call it a clique i just call it friendships being built. if what ppl say bother you so much why come on her (kona).

    blogging is just what it is. a bunch of ppl with a bunch of opinions. all are right, wrong and indifferent. why let words bother you? that’s all they are….

    i don’t post much but i still read and enjoy the comments. thanks sandra!

  121. 121
    Daisy says:

    @east you need to credit Frankie as well cause she wore it out and still does before CB did that interview lol

    @Shauny did you see So you think u can dance last night?

    @Keely :lol: that was a simple way to put it

  122. 122
    texaspaine says:

    charles is too funny no need to say more.

  123. 123
    SunnyPA says:

    @Iscream
    I’m buying your book on Friday (payday). Can’t wait to read it. I laughed at the title. I hope you have great success.

  124. 124
    wiggy2272003 says:

    Speaking of your book Iscream I was so mad because I left it at work Friday and I do most of my reading on the weekend and I didn’t have it. I saw the SR thank you, I also had to smile at the MJ one

  125. 125
    BLACKBARBIE404 says:

    WHERE’S THE FREE CHARLES T-SHIRTS??

    LMAO

  126. 126
    ELove says:

    @east… NOT A GOOD EXAMPLE because @iscream is as BIG A GROUPIE for Jiggles as YOU ARE (She was JUST playing devil’s advocate with you) :lol:

    And the SACC is FD-ing HILARIOUS !!!!!
    Warning — WIMPS aren’t ALLOWED on SR.com (KNOW THIS !!!!!)

    I RIDE for @KaraZ (Her biting-comments R warranted at times)
    AND @Chuck-n-Duck (Charles) shouldn’t be BANNED… When he gets out of hand I JUST ignore UNTIL he comes back to reality WHICH he ALWAYS does eventually :rofl:

  127. 127
    Bird says:

    I’m always the first one to complain about cliques. Granted I have not been able to get on the computer for a while between my driving job and the computer virus that disabled my home computer, but from what I’ve seen here lately, it is not the worst case of cliques I have ever seen here before. There is a lot of meaness, but that’s differant albeit just as bad. People can disagree without attacking and disrepecting one another. And for the ones who are saying it’s not that serious, I personally think it is. If someone says something to me on the web that makes me want to hunt them down and lay hands on them then its serious. Is that why people have gotten more and more disrepectful, because they don’t think it’s serious?

  128. 128
    Nina says:

    Wow!!!! I think being in a “clique” and “being disrespectful” are two different things. I remember the old clique behavior when SR first became .com (i.e. saying good morning to 20 people, roll calls and people ganging up on others b/c of their comments to their friends, etc). I’m actually glad SR eliminated that ish. Its not that type of clique behavior now.

    As for respect, I will agree that members should be respectful of other people’s comments whether they agree or not. (I feel like a mom saying that one).

    Charles is Charles and most of us knew what to expect from him (which artist he did or didn’t like). Unfortunately, I noticed him getting warnings before today…

  129. 129
    Bird says:

    As for the Charles ban I NEVER take anything he says seriously so I couldn’t care less whether he is here or not, but I could see how he could be offensive to a newbie who doesn’t know him like that.

  130. 130
    Bird says:

    Nina Says:

    I remember the old clique behavior when SR first became .com (i.e. saying good morning to 20 people, roll calls and people ganging up on others b/c of their comments to their friends, etc).
    *************************************

    Wasn’t that absolutely horrible?!?!?! Especially those exclusive roll calls. My word.

  131. 131
    MissGauzzz says:

    just logged back in..aw dammmm!!! sandra don’t ban charles! his comments are hella funny..everything is a FLOP!!! :lolol:

  132. 132
    katgirl33 says:

    I vote for Charles to be unbanned too(I know we ain’t got no say Auntie)….

    I’m thinkin it’s some kinda “celeb” conspiracy going on too with Charles…..what he say?

    :( bye Charles

  133. 133
    Shauny says:

    Daisy – I posted about SYTYCD in the Meka post (I think that’s the one you and Missy were talking about it). That 18 yr old guy that I liked is not going to be on the show. He’s sick. Some chinese hip hop guy is taking his place.

    There is also a girl injured and if she doesn’t recover by next week then she’s out too and another girl will be taking her place (I hope the black girl that I liked)

  134. 134
    Shauny says:

    oh….and just for the record ANYONE who watches SYTYCD can chime in….Just sayin

  135. 135
    katgirl33 says:

    I notice a clique forming to bring Charles back….

    L M A O!

  136. 136
    wiggy2272003 says:

    Bird, I see your point but imo thats a different issue.
    She is pointing out longer established members “cliquing” and I guess excluding newer members. Like I said Sandra does a good job of jumping in on the personally disrespect attacks when it happens. I have seen it a few times and or borderline to me Sit down and shut the f up” is one of those cases. Respect others postions and opinions.

  137. 137
    dcwife1622 says:

    I’ve been posting since Sandra posted pictures from Bobby Kris’ birthday party in 05…..

    I comment when I feel like it and don’t give a sh!t about what folks think about my comment. It’s not that serious……The internet is the devil…LOL :angry:

  138. 138
    Peachizz says:

    “If I’m taking this too seriously, let me know”
    Sorry I’m late.. who the hell is Kendhra writes(telling Sandra on ppl cause she don’t like what they say)/.. OMG…. grow upa nd get over it!!!!

  139. 139
    dcwife1622 says:

    Sandra is the only person I disagree with. LOL

    I love my President…….Where do I get Iscreams book?

  140. 140
    Daisy says:

    Shauny you mean the young guy that made the judge cry during vegas week? Say it aint so he was FAB last night in the group dance! Last night he danced with 3 other ppl in the group dance shoot

  141. 141
    Daisy says:

    @dc click on Isc name

  142. 142
    Nina says:

    @ Bird – YES!!!!! I stop reading comments after I saw all of that.

  143. 143
    dcwife1622 says:

    Thanks Daisy…..

  144. 144
    mizzdallas says:

    @dcwife

    click on iscream name and it will direct you to her book her book is really good! :)

  145. 145
    Shauny says:

    Yeah Daisy, him. He’s out!

  146. 146
    Peachizz says:

    What did Charles do again… Sandra I don’t think it’s that serious… He didn’t threaten anyone!!!!!

  147. 147
    iscream says:

    Thanks guys for directing her. Of course I have to do actual work today so I’m lurking less than usual. (Every 10 mins as opposed to 5 mins)

    Lmao. :rofl:

  148. 148
    KayCeiSoul says:

    @Bird – Yes ma’am, I agree. “It’s not that serious” because people may be offended because it has struck a nerve. I LOVE me some Sandra Rose, and I adore my fam, please believe. There are some very intelligent people on here. But folks cannot just talk to people any kind of way whether it’s in person or on the web. Flat out. Some of the responses to the letter were even disrespectful and bold.

    And all that negativity was spewed while trying to disprove the same point that was being made. Foreal – is this the only place that folks can expose their alter ego’s? I know, I know…here comes the replies.

  149. 149
    Buttercup417 says:

    Well I caught hell when I was a newbie and it didn’t bother me!! Actually I thought is funny. They wanted to know who let her in!! I’m here now!!! :nana:

  150. 150
    KayCeiSoul says:

    LOL@Buttercup417!!

  151. 151
    intensemocha says:

    CLIQUES DO EXIST-I CONCUR I CAUGHT HELL AS A NEWBIE TO AND STILL DO FROM TIME TO TIME

    IT’S AN INITIATION-IF YOU CAN HOLD YOUR OWN IN THE PLAYGROUND YOU GET TO STAY AND PLAY

    IF NOT, YOU RUN AND GO TELL THE TEACHER-LOL

    POST WHATEVER YOU LIKE-IT SHOULDN’T MATTER WHAT SOMEBODY SAYS I’VE BEEN CYBER JUMPED SEVERAL TIMES-THAT’S HOW THE WORLD TURNS ROUND THESE PARTS…..

    IT’S ALL IN FUN -ONCE THEY REALIZE YOU’RE HERE TO STAY THEY EVENTUALLY PLAY NICE-OR IF YOU HAVE BEEF GIVE IT 24HRS IT WILL CHANGE

    IT’S ALL LOVE UP IN HERE-YOU LEARN ONE ANOTHER AND YOU CAN GUESS WHOSE GOING TO GO BANANAS AND BEEF ON WHAT POSTS

    I LOVE IT!!!!! STAND YOUR GROUND, POST YOUR THOUGHTS, OR GO TO CL THAT SITE IS FOR THE WEAK AT HEART-LOL THEY KICKED ME OFF WHEN I ATTACKED THEIR CLIQUES AND THE BLOGGER-LOL

  152. 152
    ELove says:

    @intense… AGREE with everything you’ve said !!!
    And SOME of us Old-Heads actually RIDE FOR the newbies …
    Well AT LEAST the ONES worth riding for :wink:

    AGAIN, WIMPS need not apply for SR-membership :rofl:

  153. 153
    KayCeiSoul says:

    LOL!!!! @Intense

    I’VE BEEN CYBER JUMPED SEVERAL TIMES-THAT’S HOW THE WORLD TURNS ROUND THESE PARTS…..

    You are a nut for that one :rofl:

  154. 154
    2bme says:

    The only time I really ever seen us ban together is behind the ‘first” crap when a newbie loses their mind and doesn’t do their homework on SR..outside of that(which is warranted) i don’t see it..as far as the beginning where they did roll calls and what not…it didn’t last

  155. 155
    starr says:

    oh wow….nina bought up the good morning roll calls…lol I remember those days lol….

    I’ve seen cliques round these parts and ain’t nuthing cliquing lol

  156. 156
    LilMissRed says:

    @151.. girl wish I knew how to do the smiley clapping his hands.. I TOTALLY agree!

  157. 157
    ELove says:

    ^^^
    :clap: = clap w/ the colons (of course)

  158. 158
    Daisy says:

    When you bring hell maybe you catch hell just a thought *smooches*

  159. 159
    intensemocha says:

    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

    CASE IN POINT

  160. 160
    intensemocha says:

    DO WHAT I DO SCROLL RIGHT PAST THEM AND KEEP ON POSTING…LOL

  161. 161
    missy says:

    @Daisy

    :preach:

  162. 162
    iyonah says:

    #TABERNACLE @ intense #151

  163. 163
    KaraZ says:

    I’m not in no daggone clique & to be lumped in with Charles, well that’s just hateful, I’ve been calling for aunty to get rid of him forever & a day! Uugh the nerve!

    Furthermore I don’t even cuss in my daily speech, so it wouldn’t be like me to use vulgar words online to express myself.Do I disagree with people, absolutely, but I don’t think that’s against any written or unwritten rules. Your writer needs to come again.

  164. 164
    trynabeme says:

    Something more interesting:
    BREAKING NEWS: FAA Revokes Licenses Of 2 Pilots Who Missed Destination!!!!

    Finally some good news!

  165. 165
    katgirl33 says:

    Well Karaz….

    Your call has been answered today :) hello! LOL

  166. 166
    mizzdallas says:

    Is this even a real fanmail..? I believe sandra wrote this letter…

  167. 167
    shunda says:

    I used to post everyday until the job pulled my internet records. I am glad since I got laid off Sandra let me stay. I hope to have a new job in 2 weeks. Nothing anyone says really gets to me until they start going in on single parents and teen parents but then I have to realize not everyone’s circumstance is the same and take a look at myself. No need to catch feelings none of this is personal. I am in Ohio waiting on my Cavs! whoo hoo

  168. 168
    coaretained says:

    @trynabeme

    I believe they were headed here ( MN) and got caught up on sr.com..I mean the internet!

    LMAO @ this post.

  169. 169
    Shauny says:

    good luck shunda

  170. 170
    kwall says:

    mic check…can yall see me?

  171. 171
    Anna says:

    Hey Kwall. I see you. You all are in here still clicking away I see. Damn Charles. I am so disappointed. What are we going to do without our “flop” of the day posts.

  172. 172
    kwall says:

    ohkay.

    here it is…(stepping up on my soapbox)

    this site has allowed me to welcome some lifelong friends into my life. from waaay back in the old SR days we would come here…kick it…shoot the shyt and whatnot and we all started meeting each other OFF of this site. first via email then in person (they know who they are…will not name names). that was over a year ago (15 mo. to be exact…) i still talk to them at least 2-3 times a week on an email group. on what we term “the otha side”. however…comes to find out…even the otha side had dramatization! some of the other siders moved on for whatever reason but for the MOST part…most of us stay in touch.

    the point i am tryna make is well its just thanks to sandra for bringing some really AWESOME folks into my life. for connecting me up with them. if it would not have been for THIS blog i woulda never met some folks that i truly consider some of my close friends now. friends are rare…close ones? even MORE of a rarity….close friends you find on a GOSSIP BLOG? unheard of. but when you spend 40 hours a week with someone or alot of “someones” chances are you are gonna connect with them on another level. nurfin wrong with that.

    i do not participate in this blog EVERY single day anymore. that is why yall see folks sayin…”hey kwallace where you been??” when i DO comment. i called attention to the hostility a few weeks back. when i was called out by a comm. member for being a single parent, and some of my other views i put on my OLD kdub and went in. was i wrong? prolly. was she? yep. do i regret it? nope. cause we are all entitled to views without name calling and assumptions being made on our personal lives.

    yall be blessed. i’m off my box now…

    *poof

  173. 173
    tbrown says:

    I’m an old-head too…what cliques does this person speak of? I’ve never noticed… Hmmm LOL ;)

  174. 174
    Anna says:

    Kwall I think Sandra does posts like this once a year. “The Clique Posts”. I remember mentioning how some of you met in person because of Sandra. You all are not a “clique”, that’s friendship.

  175. 175
    ELove says:

    Comment #172 is very interesting AND insightful (Real)

    For the Record:
    I WAS a part of the ‘otha side’ very briefly but MY Presence there quickly became a burden for the Lasting-Harmony of that group Sooooooo I was/became ONE of the “some of the other siders moved on for whatever reason” :lol:

    But I HOLD NO ILL-WILL towards any of them…
    Life’s Too SHORT-n-BRIEF to be consumed with Pettiness IMO
    (I choose to ENJOY LIFE as much as humanly possible !!!)
    :wink:

  176. 176
    Daisy says:

    *waving at Kwall*

    Very well said :clap:

  177. 177
    shunda says:

    Thanks Shauny! @Kwall I appreciate the people I talk to from here as well it gives me a focus when I am stressed and helps me not to spaz on Diva and Weather man.

  178. 178
    kwall says:

    yes e-love you were. and i, for one missed you when you left but i understand why. for folks still to be talking bout clicks…cliques…man get over it.

    hey daisy.

    DICLAIMER: don’t want folks to think me and daisy are cliqued up. we from the same place. how do i know that? cause we post on srose dot com….

    see you too @anna.

  179. 179
    kwall says:

    *DISCLAIMER.

  180. 180
    kwall says:

    awe shunda how are diva and my weatherman??? i been interviewing a mess too so that is why i been ghost. i hope everything works out for ya!

    at first i was LOVING being laid-off. but now that i have taken the summer off, organized all of my closets, and rearranged all of the furniture in every single room…my family and i ALL agree it is time for me to go back to work. lmao.

  181. 181
    ELove says:

    @K-Dub
    APPRECIATE that bit of info because I didn’t know HOW MANY actually knew-n-understood the reason… I’m GLAD YOU were one of them that did (Real) :lol:

  182. 182
    here4beer says:

    I’m a lil late with this response, but I just wanted to say that I rarely post, mostly lurk, but I have never felt like the “cliques” freeze me out. Anytime I have posted people have only responded to my comments in a decent manner, whether they agree or not.

    just my 2 cents

  183. 183
    kwall says:

    @elove check your yahoo acct.

  184. 184
    shunda says:

    @kwall they are great! Yeah I think I told you guys I have self diagnosed ADD so this laid off thing is driving me crazy. I had an interview last week and will be at a huge job fair on Friday. I am keeping both of us in my prayers. How are the girls?

  185. 185
    kwall says:

    they are good @shunda. stay up ma.

  186. 186
    AirForceGirl says:

    Okay, I know I’m hella late on this one, but I would just like to add my two cents if I may. As a newbie, I :cosign: the clique theory. I have always noticed it, but it never bothered me that much. When I was in Sandra Rose Lurker University, it made me laugh a lil bit, but now that I am a part of the fam, I feel a lil intimidated when posting my comments. Not to call anyone out, but Charles is/was the main offender! And I don’t think that ol’ girl that y’all are calling a sensative snitch did anything wrong…all she did was speak her mind just like all y’all are saying that ur doing while posting. Why is it okay for y’all to post whatever u want, but as soon as she brings up a valid point, its a no-go? That’s all I’m saying!

  187. 187

    trynabeme Says:

    BTW Sanrda….my cousin is hurt about the “only work email addys” rule….she works for a small medical (not pharmaceutical-LOL) company & so they have att.net email addresses…..she says, “LEMME IN!”

    **********************************************************

    Have her email me. I will register anyone that you can vouch for. :)

  188. 188
    wiggy2272003 says:

    AirForceGirl,
    Maybe if she would have addressed the problem(as she saw it) right away on the post where it happened, to the offenders DIRECTLY. That is speaking your mind, giving your opinion. What she did was email Sandra( who did nothing wrong) under the guise of ” feeling bad for the newer posters” calling out specific people. Maybe thats why.
    Do you see the difference?

  189. 189
    wiggy2272003 says:

    oops

    Grown Women handle things in an adult fashion

  190. 190
    SunnyPA says:

    The only thing that really makes me made is when commenters viciously attack Sandra (different from saying she’s messy or disagreeing with her on a post). My thing is, why bother posting the rant…just leave.

  191. 191
    SunnyPA says:

    mad not made

  192. 192
    missy says:

    @wiggy :cosign:

  193. 193
    KayCeiSoul says:

    @#188

    Hey Wiggy :-)
    I know the question was originally posed for AirforceGirl, but I don’t see the connection.

    How do we know it was a guise? Should we really be making the assumption that people are disingenuine? I don’t think the letter was directed towards the whole fam as a whole, but called attention specifically to the posts that supported the statement the letter was making.

    To call out someone in a string on what they were posting(especially one of the two people mentioned in the letter) could have possibly initiated an unnecessary cyber-argument IMO, further escalating the problem. Everyone who has Sandra’s e-mail has the right to contact her, right or wrong? Walk with me know… :-)

    At the end of the day, people are going to feel the way they feel, and say what they are going to say. It doesn’t make it right, and it doesn’t always make it wrong.

    The key element to prevent making a debate into an argument is respect.

    The key element in showing adulthood verus childhood is respect & responsibility.

    It’s mature to be considerate (or don’t respond at all) to prevent making folks uncomfortable and not lashing out and trying to grandstand on people when it’s someone unknown or new that is posting. No rewards for seniority that I know of here besides sporadic friendships.

    Everyone doesn’t respond to newbies like that; but there are a select few who try to flex.

    It has happened to me on more than one occasion and I have held my own. One poster tried to go in on my kids – what was mature about that? Forgivable, of course, but immature it was.

    I don’t know Wiggy, maybe I was just raised different, and I’m not trying to throw shade your way so please don’t take it like that. When we downplay the simple things, they snowball into much bigger problems.

  194. 194
    KayCeiSoul says:

    *now –> “Walk with me know…”

    Typing to fast and too much. Sorry y’all. I’m done with it.

  195. 195
    wiggy2272003 says:

    Hey KayCei,
    I don’t take disagreeing and stating your point as throwing shade as long as its done without disrespect because like you said the key element to prevent making a debate into an argument is respect. In fact I welcome it, one of the reasons I love this site, presents other points of view.
    First I wasnt aware that the only definition of Guise was disgenuine. I guess me and dictionary.com are wrong. Because they as I thought list the synonmy as form or shape which is how I used to word.
    Of course anyone who has Sandras email has the right to contact her, but if why not go direct to the source like in life. I thought most people prefer it that way.
    Why would you not call out someone who is being disrespectful on a post? You did it when someone went in your kids right? Of maybe you emailed Sandra about it first,and she just didn’t post that.
    You said At the end of the day, people are going to feel the way they feel, and say what they are going to say. It doesn’t make it right, and it doesn’t always make it wrong”
    To me that proves my point why address Sandra about it then?

    Why not just consideratly and respectfully, address offender? Maybe they don’t even realize thier words impact? If they THEN lash out, grandstand or flex then maybe an email to Sandra would be warrented but since the key element in showing adulthood verus childhood is respect & responsibility I think being if you feel disrespected be personally responsible and respecfully disagree.
    I also don’t know if I would assume to know how folks were raised because you cant.

  196. 196
    Shauny says:

    I didn’t know people would even still be posting on this…

    AirForce..in regards to your comments and agreeing to the cliques let me ask you of your version of what a click is because there were several thrown out there. My version was of a group of people teaming up on another poster for their beliefs, or egging a cyber fight on in favor of another person. Some others thought a clique was simply having off topic conversations with others on and not including everyone in it. I also saw that some people thought that if you simply agreed with one persons comments over another then you clique with them.

    All different theories and no ones is wrong but my question to you since you co signed is which of these do you define as cliquing and how did it intimidate you? Charles offends EVERYONE. He has the same relationship with posters as Sandra does…a love/hate one. The girl in the original email said that newer posters seems intimidated by older posters. When I came on here I was asked the same thing…who are you? Sandra I thought registration was closed..etc but you know what, I didn’t owe ANYONE an introduction to who I was or where I came from. I posted what I wanted to and if you wanted to respond you did and if you didn’t then keep it moving. I never felt intimidated when I was new on here.

  197. 197
    SunnyPA says:

    ROFL…I’m still reading this post, so let me add my .02

    Sometimes it’s hard to directly address individuals on the blog. Especially when it gets heated. I’ve gotten into heated exchanges a couple of times. Later when I go back and read the comments, I was embarrassed by how immature I got. Those times I’ve asked Sandra to delete my comments afterwards (she wouldn’t). Now, I’m very careful in how I disagree or I’ll pull back. It really is about how you comment.

    THERE ARE EXCEPTIONS — and you have to know who they are.

    Charles is one of them. Charles laid into me one time and I should have ignored it but didn’t. Later I was mad at myself for letting someone whom I don’t know anything about get to me (it was a bad day). I don’t think Charles is mean, most of the time his comments were general and funny.

  198. 198
    KayCeiSoul says:

    @wiggy – to me, your whole response just went in circles and gave me no further insight as to where you were coming from. I don’t like being confused honey. I won’t ask again.

    @Shauny – I agree with what you said too. Posters don’t have to even acknowledge it. Even still, it sours the mood sometimes, ya’ know?

  199. 199
    KayCeiSoul says:

    And when you use guise in the tense that you used it in, it does meean this:

    guise: a purpose or motive alleged or an appearance assumed in order to cloak the real intention or state of affairs.

    Even in different ways it means to cloak, costume, clothe, cover, etc. etc. etc.

    It’s ok though – all is well. :-)

  200. 200
    wiggy2272003 says:

    KayC, I see your point, trying to type undercover leads to mistakes. When I just reread my post I see I missed some words and whatnot here and there so it might be confusing.
    Outline
    I meant guise as in the form or shape of.
    Isn’t it mature and responsible to address a problem you have with the offender first? Like I said maybe they don’t even realize their words impact.
    You said you held your own when someone addressed you and your children? Why not hold your own with Charles?

  201. 201
    KayCeiSoul says:

    You sneakin’? LOL!! You need a privacy screen or you betta’ exercize those fingers on the alt+tab keys!

    Anyhoo – Absolutely! If the battle is yours by all means have at it (respectfully), but some folks are just better left alone. (rofl) Doesn’t bother me, and Charles never came for me. Never gave him a reason to. Even if he had I wouldn’t have gone there with him in the same way he came for me, I would have brought it on in, you feel me?

    Now if ANYONE addresses my children then it’s anybody’s game because that is a personal attack. I don’t personally attack anyone Wiggy, not in real life or on the web UNLESS me or mine are personally attacked. That’s the offense in it.

  202. 202
    wiggy2272003 says:

    Well thats what I thought I meant I didn’t see any personal attacks in the email Charles had a valid point, that about the atl people someone always posts that they know them they always new and seem to never post again(according to Charles I hadn’t noticed) it wasn’t a personal attack. Thats why I said why didn’t she just address the offender. Anyway you don’t have to answer we just saw it differently.

  203. 203
    ggouch says:

    I have been a member for awhile. I wish I had the time I had back then to hang out more and voice my opion.

    BUT: I am cracking up!!! But I didn’t see this one coming at all….did this really provoke over 200 responses?

    The COMMENT Section is the best part of the posts. Sometimes you can just tell by the heading just how HOT this section is going to be.

    There are certain people that have such a way with words that you can’t wait to steal…I mean read their creative one-linners or pledgerize…I mean take in their clever little metaphors.

    Blogs are where the MANY opinions are nutured, cultivated, emulated and when necessary ripped up from their roots.

    WOW to the newbies Didn’t you type in WWW. before the Sandrarose.com? WWW= WORLD WIDE WEB. This is a BLOG of MANY.
    and an even bigger WOW to SR for giving it the attention: With all respect…you are taking this way to serious.

    Sometimes it gets a little heated, but so what. How do you take something personal from made up screen names and avatars of a “Crying Baby”, “Children Pics”, “Cartoon Characters”, “Folks repping the CELEBS and my favorite:”What ever the hell that AVATAR is Charles posted”….LOL

    BTW: TEAM CHARLES!! TEAM CHARLES!! all the way!!!! REALLY??? Who on here don’t know that like some of SR Posts, Charles’ comments are simply put out to provoke CONTROVERSY in the name of entertainment.

    What did he say that got him banned anyway? He was’nt even tried by a jury of his posting peers!!!!! What about the E-CONSTITUTION!

    Bring him back SR. You of all people should appreciate his ability to provoke thought.

Comments are closed for this post