<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Wale &#8211; Pretty Girls</title> <atom:link href="http://sandrarose.com/2010/02/wale-pretty-girls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://sandrarose.com/2010/02/wale-pretty-girls/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 13:43:40 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: DownSouthZeta</title><link>http://sandrarose.com/2010/02/wale-pretty-girls/#comment-274274</link> <dc:creator>DownSouthZeta</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:32:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://sandrarose.com/2010/02/09/wale-pretty-girls/#comment-274274</guid> <description>I love Wale. That CD is fire! That is all.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Wale. That CD is fire! That is all.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jsquare</title><link>http://sandrarose.com/2010/02/wale-pretty-girls/#comment-274261</link> <dc:creator>jsquare</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:10:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://sandrarose.com/2010/02/09/wale-pretty-girls/#comment-274261</guid> <description>Artists have to pay for videos out of their advances. It&#039;s a recession, I wouldn&#039;t spend millions of dollars on a video, either! Especially if I&#039;m gonna owe the record company because of it. Record sales aren&#039;t what they used to be.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Artists have to pay for videos out of their advances. It&#8217;s a recession, I wouldn&#8217;t spend millions of dollars on a video, either! Especially if I&#8217;m gonna owe the record company because of it. Record sales aren&#8217;t what they used to be.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Reality</title><link>http://sandrarose.com/2010/02/wale-pretty-girls/#comment-274230</link> <dc:creator>Reality</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:38:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://sandrarose.com/2010/02/09/wale-pretty-girls/#comment-274230</guid> <description>I know some women say it&#039;s not a big deal, but if we dont speak up there will eventually be no more dark women in media. This will brain wash the up and coming generation even more. Blacks loves to throw other races in their videos,but u MIGHT see one chocolate person in other races videos.  So what does that say?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know some women say it&#8217;s not a big deal, but if we dont speak up there will eventually be no more dark women in media. This will brain wash the up and coming generation even more. Blacks loves to throw other races in their videos,but u MIGHT see one chocolate person in other races videos.  So what does that say?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Reality</title><link>http://sandrarose.com/2010/02/wale-pretty-girls/#comment-274228</link> <dc:creator>Reality</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:33:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://sandrarose.com/2010/02/09/wale-pretty-girls/#comment-274228</guid> <description>Save it Wale,so u have no control over your art? I guess that is why your career is in the crapper.  A video like this should have included every race of women, cus we are all beautiful. The video total cost was probaly $15.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Save it Wale,so u have no control over your art? I guess that is why your career is in the crapper.  A video like this should have included every race of women, cus we are all beautiful. The video total cost was probaly $15.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Go-Go Girlie</title><link>http://sandrarose.com/2010/02/wale-pretty-girls/#comment-274170</link> <dc:creator>Go-Go Girlie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:16:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://sandrarose.com/2010/02/09/wale-pretty-girls/#comment-274170</guid> <description>Well Wale didn&#039;t have any control over the women in the video--it was the label.  He wanted the dark-skinned earthy sisters, but his label made that decision.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Wale didn&#8217;t have any control over the women in the video&#8211;it was the label.  He wanted the dark-skinned earthy sisters, but his label made that decision.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ryand91</title><link>http://sandrarose.com/2010/02/wale-pretty-girls/#comment-274144</link> <dc:creator>ryand91</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:11:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://sandrarose.com/2010/02/09/wale-pretty-girls/#comment-274144</guid> <description>Wow, I just lost mad respect for Wale, there was absolutely not even a hint of chocolate in that video besides his black, dusty ass. I&#039;m so over rap and rappers in general.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I just lost mad respect for Wale, there was absolutely not even a hint of chocolate in that video besides his black, dusty ass. I&#8217;m so over rap and rappers in general.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Choco</title><link>http://sandrarose.com/2010/02/wale-pretty-girls/#comment-274074</link> <dc:creator>Choco</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 19:55:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://sandrarose.com/2010/02/09/wale-pretty-girls/#comment-274074</guid> <description>Well I was wondering where all the sista&#039;s were at also...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I was wondering where all the sista&#8217;s were at also&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 1/3 queries in 0.001 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 270/270 objects using disk: basic

Served from: sandrarose.com @ 2012-05-28 12:59:58 -->
