Tyrese’s Baby Mama Refuses Child Visitation; Cops Called

SMH. Why would the baby being sick be a reason for him not to see her? The Momma seeing her while she sick. If anything she shoulda called him to come and see her while she was sick.

SMH. But that hoe accept that child support/extortion money every month tho.

NObody in the background got on sleeves either tho…

@JUST LOOKING
“As far as this Extortion that “MAN” speaks of, Judges don’t pick a number out the sky. The amount of child support is based upon calculations and current income according to current wages from IRS, this document is viewed in court by attorney and judge. They just don’t do do all willynilly. ”
_______________________

The concept of it being on his income itself is Willy Nilly.

The fact that there is NO assurance that it even goes to the welfare of the child is Willy Nilly.

GTFOH!

The whole concept in and of itself is WILLY PHUCKIN NILLY!

@BUTTERCUP
“SMH. But that hoe accept that child support/extortion money every month tho.
===========
Is it still extortion if they were married?
___________________

I ain’t know they was married. So since they was married, it’s prolly not extortion because more than likely they both agreed to have a child.

@RAZZ
“The amount of child support is based upon calculations and current income according to current wages from IRS, this document is viewed in court by attorney and judge. They just don’t do do all willynilly
———-
Same thing with T.O.’s CS matters I was saying yesterday… but it’s not being heard though. Falling on deaf ears as rediculousness ”
___________________

WTF? Everyone in here already know the money is stolen based on a man’s income.

The thing with T.O. is that they based a 18 year monthly extortion payment amount decision on an amount of money he would be making for 5 years.

That is ridiculous… on top of the entire concept being ridiculous.

Yeah they were married for a VERY short period of time…but I remember when they divorced she did not get anywhere near the amount of money she was trying to get in alimony and child support…it was a bitter split if I remember correctly…
________________________

She prolly thought she had hoodwinked her a nigga real good and was set up for life and the chit backfired.

I would be mad too if I was her. This extortion thing is set up for her to win and she still lost.

@RAZZ

I read your whole dumb azz statement. It don’t change nothing.

@RAZZ
“Essenze- EGGZACKLY!! Know the type of person you’re dealing with and you wont have to be mad about court proceedings and orders and etc.”
_______________

You don’t ever “KNOW” someone! GTFOH. Got mothaphuckas get murked by they spouses and chit. I guess that’s their fault too cause they shoulda “Knew” their spouse.

You NEVER “know” someone.

@ESSENSE
“I hate when “people” make it like a woman trapped. Negro you the one with the dyck so you had a hand in it. Sex makes babies, sex ed 101.”
___________________

No, sex makes PREGNANCIES and women DECIDE on babies.
Two steps there babe, two steps.

@NAKEYA
“No, sex makes PREGNANCIES and women DECIDE on babies.
———–
@Man are you saying that these women should have abortions? (serious question)
____________

Nope. I’m saying that since a WOMAN DECIDES, she should be responsible.

If men had a say in the BIRTH or not, they should be responsible. A man can’t force a woman to give birth or have an abortion (and he shouldn’t be able to). But he SHOULD have an equal right to choose like a woman does with the birth. Not the pregnancy, the BIRTH because a woman CHOOSES to give birth.

Just like with every other law in the country you are solely responsible for your sole decision.

@NAKEYA
“So your saying, the man should not have to take care of the baby if he does not want it?”
____________

isn’t that EXACTLY what a woman can do now?

@ESSENCE3
“Nope. Aint buying it. Shyt the moment you have sex you made the decision.”
________________

No, men take a CHANCE on one of two outcomes.

WOMEN take a chance, and THEN make a decision.

Let us make a decision too.

@ESSENSE
You sound like an intelligent young lady. Read the history of “child support.”

It has nothing to do with the child. It was originally only intendeed for married spouses who got divorced so the female wouldn’t become a burden of the state going back to the 1800’s.

But after the Civil War, WWI and WWII, the country flat out needed to increase the population. The census was conducted, which showed the disparity between women and men (due to the wars) and they needed a way to jump start the births. What they found was that women would have children without being married… if they could afford it.

Like I said, research it yourself…

@ESSENCE
Oh, there is no other view point. I have facts on my side. You are just speaking on emotion.

And like I always say, if I could steal someone’s money without consequence, i would too.

@ESSENCE
“Shyt you playing around in the haystack on the farm and your ass got knocked up, you was marrying that man lol”
____________________

Yup. And women knew the consequences so it was rare that they would get knocked up without being married.

But the US government basically support and champion having bastard children in order to increase our numbers.

You don’t find it strange that the law doesn’t place guidelines on how the money should be spent for “child support.”

It was never intended for the child. It was always extortion from the beginning. But they labeled it “child support” so the general public would be behind it.