Ludacris

Illseed of Allhiphop.com is a professional who always links back to Sandrarose.com, unlike MediaFakeout. But a post Illseed published on the hip hop site today got it all wrong.

Illseed writes:

Lowkey, Luda is G’d up! I’m hearing he or somebody in his legal department put the smack down on a blogger and forced her to take down a post that claimed Luda would be paying 10k in child support.

In this day and age of gossipy rhetoric, stars generally let stuff go, because the rumors are generally gone after the news cycle is over. But, Sandra Rose is known to kick up dust, especially in the Atlanta area.

He added:

Truthfully, there hasn’t been any information that has refuted the initial report, but the take down indicates its now true. Anyway, Luda still has his lady and another Fast & Furious movie coming so he’s good.

It’s a long story, but the truth of the matter is Chris “Ludacris” Bridges and his legal team did not threaten me with legal action if I did not take my post down.

What happened was this: my source down at the courthouse alerted me to the fact that Ludacris and his baby mama, Tamika Fuller, were in a closed door meeting that day. My source, who works in another part of the courthouse, could not be in the room (for obvious reasons).

Someone else who claimed to have intimate knowledge of what went on during the closed door meeting told me a string of lies, saying the judge ordered Luda to pay Tamika $10K a month.

Luckily, my source saw the post and notified me that it was ALL LIES. So I snatched the post down.

Ludacris was not ordered to pay Tamika $10K a month and, in fact, the meeting had nothing to do with determining child support.