Sean Combs continues to demonstrate extraordinarily poor judgment when it comes to exploiting his twins.
Sean brazenly pimps his naked twin girls inside the November issue of L’Uomo Vogue magazine. Yes, those are girls with bow ties on looking like little boys!
Obviously his desperate plea for attention is working because I am posting this incredibly distasteful photo. By pimping his twins to this magazine, Sean Combs has sunk to a new low.
Photo: JustJared.com
This entry was posted on Saturday, October 25th, 2008 at 10:24 pm and filed under Birth and babies, Books/magazines, Celeb Photos, Celeb screw ups, Celebrity Baby, Celebrity Seed, Publicity Stunt . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed or Trackback from your own site. This site is Gravatar enabled. Sign up to upload your own avatar.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
In a way I have a problem with this also. I mean, its a cute picture and I know that this isn’t the first advertisement of babies w/o tops but I feel that for these to be his children and he allowed this, its a problem. Maybe its b/c I’ve become more aware of child preditors or the fact that they get off on this type of stuff but I just think it could have been just as pretty a picture if they had clothes on…even just a shirt and their diaper but damn. Come on Diddy…be a FATHER to your GIRLS!!!
I saw this somewhere earlier (**** I think?), and I also thought that this was a bit much. I agree Tasha. It really wasn’t the bowties for me, it was the fact that they were nude. They are not babies they are toddlers and they need to be covered up. This is also not a baby mag, it is one that is for adults and this photo was totally inappropriate for a magazine as such. I know that he is proud to show off his girls (and he should be) but he could have done it in a much more tasteful way!!
If you can’t pimp yourself, then don’t pimp at all… nuff said.
Don’t use the future to hype your past glory…
Highly inappropriate, and borderline pedophilia. I see nothing artistic about this photo, at all, and it’s not because the little girls are not cute.I know Diddy knows that he can’t please all the people all the time, but somewhere in cyberspace, or on the news stand, he’s made a child predator very happy. I thought a father was supposed to protect their child(ren)?
IT’S Kiddie-Porn (Plain-N-Simple!!!)
This is a European magazine??? - L’HOMO Right ;-)
And it’s Very Disturbing to me that this FOOL would even allow himself to ever consider doing something LIKE THIS with his daughters… Yet Alone to ACTUALLY do something like this WITH HIS DAUGHTERS !!!!!
But Hey Y’all ALREADY know how I feel about him anyway ;-)
This photo is sick…
I knew he lost his mind with all the posts he does on the net. This is not right. This to me is child porn for the pervs to get off on. What kind of father is he. Sandra your post stating that he is “pimp daddy” is sad to me. Not on your part but his ****assness part. I see he is still pissed that not one magazine wanted to take photos of his twin baby girls for all of their cuteness. The pic of him with his daughters is sad and on called for. You can pimp your kids out with clothes on and some still will not care. P diddy daddy mofo is a ass for this. I never liked him and this just reminds me more that he will exploit and do anything to be a celebrity. How do you do this to your own kids? SMH real hard. I am so not fealing what he thinks is cute. His daughters in the pic don’t look like they are/were willing to pose for it. I hope no self esteem Kim did not approve this bull ****. I am sure she did. A paycheck is at the end of the day is just that ‘a paycheck to her. Sad Sad and more sad. Is this what happens when ppl have noney. Brad Pitt took a pic of his better half nursing one of their twins, that was human nature. Diddy sitting in a suit with his naked daughters, bad taste.
wow yall need to get a grip
Oh my God. Kim actually let this go down ?
I mean I know they are babies but my goodness. How does this man have no qualms about allowing his daughters to be photographed (seemingly) nude ??? They may as well have gone all the way and put the bunny ears on those girl. You’d think a father would be more protective than this of his daughters. This would be inappropriate even if it were his sons. SMH.
Wow-ok
I just don’t like the pic-not at all the girls are cute and all-but I agree them being nude is inappropriate & for those who think that we are tripping
yes we’ve seen nude pics of babies but rarely do we see the front view of their va jay jay-it’s usually their bottoms or they are topless-this is just done in poor taste-he has the babies exposed for the world to see and them to remember in horror when they grow up-I cringe at the site of my nudy pics (bathtub shots w a wash cloth covering my private) but yet in still I cringe-now they have to deal with the fact that the whole world saw these pics
and the word pimp is very appropriate-why the hell does he have on all of his clothes and the babies are nude? naw if he had on a bath robe or a tshirt and the girls were playing in the bedroom on the bed in a diaper-now that’s a scene i could imagine something more realistic-but what’s the setting for this pic-nothing about it seems natural
just a pic of a man all dressed up to his next victims-this man is heartless and I never really was bothered by his need for attention by the media but this for me has made me question just how far IS this man willing to go for a buck?
THEIR MAMA KIM PORTER NEEDS TO BE SLAPPED-HE COULD HAVE HUNG THESE BABIES UPSIDE DOWN FROM A DAMN CHRISTMAS TREE AND SHE WOULDN’T HAVE CARED-SHE’S JUST HAPPY THAT HER BABIES PICS ARE IN THE PUBLIC EYE
I BET HE KNEW THESE PICS WOULD BE VIEWED AS CONTROVERSIAL….I HOPE HE KNOWS SOME PEDOPHILE IS SOMEWHERE LUSTING AND GETTING OFF ON THIS PIC JUST BECAUSE OF HIM-PRIVATE NUDE PICS OF YOUR CHILD IS ONE THING BUT I CAN RECALL A MOVIE ON LIFETIME WHERE A MOTHER WAS ARRESTED FOR CHILD PORNOGRAPHY FOR SNAPPING A NUDE PIC OF THEIR CHILDREN-TO ME THIS IS NO DAMN DIFFERENT, ACTUALLY WORST-AT LEAST THEIR PHOTOS BECAME PUBLIC BY ACCIDENT & NOT ON PURPOSE-
i dont knock adding the kids to the campaign, i mean, they are next in line to manage his ‘empire.’ i do knock him for not having his OTHER daughter in the pic as well. acknowledge her; she is YOURS.
he can be creative and add a kids scent and fun lip glosses later on when his girls are a bit older, but the entire marketing campaign would be in vain???? if daughter #3 is missing.
there is no way in the hell my daughter’s father or my husband is going to take either one of my girls and do no shyt like this. hell my husband still feels uncomfortable giving our baby girl a bath. this is flucked up on alot of levels.
i hope child protective services give arrogant puffy and kim skrait HELL behind these pornographic pics.
see that is their problem…they think they are above the law. i had some neighbors who have since moved who took bathtub pictures of their sons age 3 and 6 and the police came knocking on their door. the law is not playing behind stuff like this in 2008.
both sean and kim need their azzes whipped behind this here mess. i bet grandma janice gonna cuss somebody the hail out when SHE see this….
I couldn’t even get naked bath pics (with his father holding him) of my baby developed and he’s just 3 months. Go figure
they’re not nude. wow, i didn’t read the post before posting my first comment. are yall saying they’re nude because they have no shirts on???
How is he going to put out sexually suggestive photos of his own children? You know perverts who are into this kid of thing are right clicking and asaving and gearing up to buy the magazine. These girls might not be 100% naked but the picture suggests that, actually dare I say that these CHILDREN are styled to look like playboy bunnies (the bowtie and all). I don’t know if we can blame Kim Porter, because they share custody for now, but her next steps will be very telling of her true character.
SR, for once, I agree with you…str8 away. I bet Sarah…”
the jump off” would never allow her daughter to be exploited this way. Kim has lost her mind for jumping on for this one. I saw these pics and was extremely disgusted.
Or will Kim do anything Puff tells her to do?
i thought nude pictures of children on the Internet was illegal….considered child pornography
What a Mother F*cking Idiot!
Expoliation of children at its finest and Kim if youthink this is cute or worth it you are a fool.
Chance really is better of not being in the spotlight at all.
Diddy/Puffy whateva his name is needs to wake up and smell the damn coffee real talk. What an idiot?
Those girls should not be NUDE at all … just look at the photo, your lying to yourself if you think for a second its ok.
now we know why sarah keeps it low-key. this is totally disgusting.
ATL_HONEY Says:
I couldn’t even get naked bath pics (with his father holding him) of my baby developed and he’s just 3 months. Go figure
*********************************************
one of my friends tried to do the same thing with her son and husband. the baby was a newborn but had to put a diaper on and it was a professional photographer.
I guess it’s safe to assume that they have on pampers…But you clearly don’t see them. Looking at the picture the children “appear” naked..I personally wouldn’t put my girls out there like that without a shirt on..But I wasn’t so much appalled by that.. Although there are some sick mofos out there that get off on visuals like this so I’m shocked that anyone would allow their child/children to be put in such a situation. Someone get child protective services on the line..
JustSayin
SOME OF YOU ARE BEING TO JUDGEMENTAL. THEY APPEAR TO BE NAKED, YES. BUT AT THE SAME TIME WHAT CAN YOU PHYSICALLY SEE WITH YOUR EYES? IS THIS ANY DIFFERENT FROM THE CHILD ON THE TELEVISION COMMERCIAL RUNNING AROUND WITH NO PAMPER WHAT SO EVER AND YOU SEE THEIR NAKED BOTTOM? NOT LIKING DIDDY IS ONE THING BUT THIS IS NOTHING NEW OR NOTHING FOR EVERYONE TO GET THEIR PANTIES IN A BUNCH.
@Munchosgirl, ask the authorities what the difference is. I’m sure they’d be happy to explain it to you. No one said they approve of those commercials either, but apparently the FCC and the authorities approve. I think there is way too much exploitation of children allowed these days. NONE should be allowed, whether it’s the naked baby in the diaper commercial or Diddy posing with his almost two-years old girls who are topless, pant-less and seemingly nude with bow ties on. I have missed the point of these pictures.
He didn’t intentionally try to make kid-porn, he was trying to be EUROPEAN, and maybe he missed the mark. I don’t have kids, but when I first saw this I just thought when they get older this might embarrass or hurt them more than anything, just because they are naked. But I wouldn’t call him a dumb ass, or JUDGE him because we aren’t suppose to JUDGE him and what makes any of you any better than him.
No you might not expose your child like that, but I’m pretty sure none of ya’ll are perfect and lived a perfect life. I’m sure there are some things ya’ll have done, and if it was exposed to the world you would received the same harsh judgement.
But that’s just me, I don’t care for the photographs, but that’s about it. It’s a difference between having an opinion and being blatantly hateful.
Even if they do have diapers on the pictures are very poor taste. I remember a lifetime movie where a man took pictures of his son in the bathtub and he lost custody. It was a big fight.
luxe.li I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU ARE SAYING. YOU ARE NOT HATING BECAUSE OF DIDDY YOU JUST DON’T CARE FOR THE PICTURE. I CAN COMPLETELY UNDERSTAND THAT. IT WAS MY INTENTION TO POINT OUT THAT SOME ON HER ARE JUDGING BUT THIS TYPE OF THING CAN BE SEEN EVERYDAY ON TELEVISION JUST THE SAME. HELL I AM A PARENT, I HAVE PICTURES OF MY DAUGHTER IN THE TUB, AS WELL AS MY SON. IF YOU HAVE YOUR CHILD PICTURE TAKING AT SEARS THEY HAVE A PROP OF THE JOHNSON & JOHNSON PRODUCTS AND YOUR CHILD IS PLACED IN THE TUB, THEY APPEAR TO BE NAKED. BECAUSE IT’S DIDDY AND HIS TWINS SOME THINK HE & KIM SHOULD BE ON TRAIL SOMEWHERE. THEN ANOTHER POSTER ONLY HAS A PROBLEM BECAUSE CHANCE ISN’T INCLUDED. AND WE WONDER WHY THE WORLD IS GOING TO HELL IN A HANDBASKET!
All you peps need to get a grip. There is nothing wrong with the kids taking pictures with their shirts off. Plus, they do not look like little boys.
I guess Diddy can’t do anything right is some peoples eyes.
What I would fault him for is not having the other daughter in the picture. Heck, they all look alike. I promise they look like triplets not twins and a step sister.
ATTENTION WHORE AT ITS WORST! I give won’t give his sorry ass no slack for this! Those girls are obviously naked! And why wouldn’t you put clothes on them if they’re going to be seen worldwide! SICK BASTARD! I feel sorry for them because their father is the most SELFISH ASSWHOLE in the industry! He did this for HIM, not them. SICK F**K! The photographer could have been a pedophile for all he knew! BASTARD!
I’m sorry BUT I reared my daughter as a single-parent AND YES I’m a black man… AND I have NEVER taken a picture of my daughter w/o her clothes on OR in a bath tub… AND I definitely haven’t went to a studio and have some stranger take a picture of my child in a tub!!! What exactly IS the purpose in doing that???
The SADDEST thing about this is that So Many adults think that there’s nothing wrong with this pic/photo (Truly Sad!!!)
I PRAY for the children who have No CHOICE in who their Parent/Care-takers are ;-)
Kissan, IF THE FCC APPROVE THEN IT MUST NOT BE A PROBLEM WITH THE AUTHORITES. ALSO IF THE AUTHORITES DIDN’T APPROVE OF THESES PHOTOS, THEY WOULDN’T BE PUTTING OUT THIS EDITION WITH THE PHOTOS. YOU DON’T SEE THEIR VAGINAS NOR THEIR BOTTOMS, SO IF A PERSON IS IMAGINING SEEING ANYTHING, THEY ARE THE ONES WITH THE PROBLEM.
Quote: The SADDEST thing about this is that So Many adults think that there’s nothing wrong with this pic/photo (Truly Sad!!!)
I think that sums it up quite nicely.
again yall need to calm down, wow yall are overly judemental, for one people can get ‘off’ on anything!, is this child porn? clearly no Americans period are so full of themselves its crazy, someone brought up the FCC, those bozos, censorship is tearing this country apart
back to the photos, i see 2 cute babies, nothing sexual nothing wrong, i see a proud father, i see on this board people that get off wagging their finger every chance they get and jumping on someone back calm down, its not that serious
God Bless you, Elove. I agree with you 100%.
AND I have NEVER taken a picture of my daughter w/o her clothes on OR in a bath tub… AND I definitely haven’t went to a studio and have some stranger take a picture of my child in a tub!!! What exactly IS the purpose in doing that???
————————————————————-
So you have something against taking kids to ’sears’ for pictures??? whats the purpose?? its a problem with having professional photos of your loved ones? to document them as they grow up so quickly
guess a ’strange’ police officer firefighter cant save yall lives if need me, how about that strange teacher, uh oh he doesnt know my child,
THAT is truly sad
God Help her
Not that I am defending him, nonetheless, that magazing is Italian (I believe) and Europeans are not as uptight about nudity as Americans.
My interpretation of this photography is that they were portraying the girls in their “natural state” and it was supposed to be received as pure and virginal.
As children, my mother said we liked to run around the house naked before our bath and she took pictures. AND even posted one of them on the wall. It was the cutest thing ever!
Do I agree with that being in a magazine? It makes me a little uncomfortable. But I think it’s adorable! You have to see this picture through the eyes of a European. We are such a hyper-sexual society that anytime Americans see a nakes person, it is supposed to represent SEX. Nudity can be very artistic. But, I do believe the picture may be better suited as a portrait in the privacy of his own home.
Furthermore, I think they were trying to make them mini-moguls with the bow-tie.
That photo is just plain sik. Why is the mother of the year Kim Porter and why’d she let him do that to this girls? I can just see R KElly having this plastered all over his bedroom.
“Seeeeems like you’re readyyyyyyyy”
[…] Is Diddy Pimping His Babies or Are we Overreacting? […]
HE JUST MADE EVERY PEDOPHILE BUST A QUICK ONE..THIS IS NOT BACK IN THE DAY WHEN WE ALL HAD BATHTUB PICTURES OUR PARENTS WOULD EMBARRASS US WITH WHEN COMPANY CAME OVER..FOLKS ARE MORE SICK TODAY THEN THEY WERE BACK THEN..AT LEAST THEY ‘FOUGHT” THEIR URGES MORE..THIS WAS POOR JUDGEMENT PLAIN AND SIMPLE..I BETCHA SARAH WOULDN’T ALLOW THIS ISH TO HAPPEN TO HER CHILD
[…] “By pimping his twins to this magazine, Sean Combs has sunk to a new low,” commented SandraRose.com. #Permalink Tags: Celeb Kids, diddy pic, musics, […]
This picture is in very bad taste!
I AM SPEECHLESS
[…] Is Diddy Pimping His Babies or Are we Overreacting? […]
I don’t like the picture, but you don’t pimp your own daughters for PR. If you’re gonna do it, do it in tasteful fashion please. These girls are gonna look back at this 20 years from now and say WTF!??!? They might have pampers on, but they’re little girls! Now if they were boys, I would still be uncomfortable, but with a boy I can understand to a point of not having a shirt on. European mag or not, I’ve seen better photos than this.
@mj- you are 100% CORRECT-not tasteful @ all … how much better would the photos have been if the girls had on something - anything visible … they could have been in in an all black or silver piece. Is this an advertisement or part of a spread to include with an article? If so … what is the article about???
To those who think these pictures are just dandy, do you not see the subtle references to playboy bunnies (waitresses) in the bow tie and hair style that these twins are sporting.
There is some perv nutting to these pics right about now, and Sean’s first priority, as their father, should be protecting them from any possible harm or exploitation; he should now be facilitating it.
KaraZ, DO YOU REAALY THINK THESE PICTURES ARE GOING TO BRING HARM TO THE TWINS. THESE AREN’T CHILDREN WHO LIVE A NORMAL LIFE FIRST OF ALL. PERVERTS THAT PREY ON CHILDREN COULD CARELESS IF THE CHILD IS DRESSED OR NOT. LIKE I SAID BEFORE, FOR THE PEOPLE WHO SEE ANYTHING EXCEPT FOR LIL GIRLS SITTING ON A COUCH ARE THE ONES WITH THE PROBLEM. YOU SEE HOW YOU YOURSELF JUST BOUGHT UP PLAYBOY BUNNIES, I SWARE TO GOODNESS, I NEVER EVEN THOUGHT OF THAT WHEN LOOKING AT THE PICTURES. MAYBE YOU NEED TO CHECK YOURSELF. I MEAN A PLAYBOY BUNNY HAVE EARS, TAIL AND DRESSED IN ONE PIECE LEOTARD, YOU ARE WAY AHEAD OF THE GAME HUNNY.
I absolutelly hate this photo! I don’t get it the whole bowtie thing because I agree they look like little boys. I don’t see what was the problem with putting little shirts on them or at least a damn vest. I never agree with children being paraded around half naked. All that money that man owns he could’ve came better than this. Kim was definitely not on her job.
Sandra I am with you on this one, I am surprise that the mother would allow this.
To me this is Kiddie Porn.
HE’S STUPID!
I don’t get the bow ties and I don’t get the message. The picture is very odd and not in a good way.
I really don’t like this pic for the main reason of the “simulated” nudity. Back in the day, our parents all shot nude pics of us yes…however, due to the power of the internet and easier access to photoshop, kiddie porn websites, etc, there is a problem with people who work hard to get the problem of child pornography erased. Now this man who clearly didn’t think very hard about what he was doing when he pulled this stunt. I’m not thinking they are wearing pampers because I can see to pretty low and I’ve never seen low cut pampers before IMO.