I did not write this Blind Item. Please direct your inquiries and complaints to the original source.
“This B list actress likes to pretend this break baby doesn’t exist, but her athlete husband is still hooking up with the mother of the baby.”
Disclaimer:
Photos used in Blind Item posts are for illustration purposes only and are not intended to identify any particular individual as the subject of this post. We take no responsibility or liability for the assumptions made by our readers.
Well …… Wade looking older up yonder too … dude looks at least 39 – 40 chile
Whoa no not Mary Jane Paul! I hate to say it cause I love her as an actress but its called KARMA boo boo!
No really??!! Listen as long as her legs swing open for him..he gone hit..MEANWHILE…
I just made some coffee so strong and black..err time i sip i start hummin a negro spiritual…
Where the lip quiver emote at ….
All I can do is just give my Cam look… But no shock here.
Not for nothing, but we can all see she is ignoring the hell out of this kid. They leave the baby out of family photos and everything. And really I blame him. Because not one soul in heaven is going to separate me from my child. You don’t want to accept this kid, then poof be gone. It’s not like you had no idea the kid was here. smh. If this is true, she gets ZERO respect from me. Now THAT would be a sorry ass woman.
at all
Not the negro spiritual ??…..yes that good strong coffee right there!!!
Chile I can’t stomach Geneva azz
I read a CDAN blind a couple of years ago that he revealed a few months later that said Gabby was making fun of Dwayne’s first wife’s mental issues to anybody who would listen. She was so out of pocket, he had to check her about it. So reading this, eh… no sympathy.
That sounds like the kind of coffee that will give you the runs.
I personally think Gabby is embarrassed & don’t want to speak publicly about the kid. Now that baby mama I think is the one that’s messy as hell. Since she’s not a celeb people tend to over look her, but I know her kind.
Women kill me with this bs…you taking it out on the most innocent, unwilling (baby didn’t ask to be here) individual in the entire situation- THE BABY. But yet you keke’n all in the face of the person who made the break baby; you damn nut! Where does her logic come from??
I’d be reluctant too. Accepting the child has to be a process and it’s not immediate.
Damn you! You just made me LOL in front of massa!!
I heard that too! I can see it.
If the baby momma wants to still fawk him, she can but as we can see he still ain’t gonna claim her. You haven’t won nothing but a nut fawking a man that ain’t claiming you.
What logic? It’s a shame. A real shame. And for him to allow it? nope. Not cool. You wanted to marry his cheating ass anyway, so why treat this baby like that? Not cool at all.
but her athlete husband is still hooking up with the mother of the baby.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
WHALE GOOD! *bams desk like a care*
Gabby is the survivor of a brutal sexual assault. Who knows what kind of psychological damage was done to her.
….see…she knew this child was here. She married him anyway. SO how long does the kid have to be on the side lines before he can come around? That’s not at all fair to the kid. Since she still wanted him, she knew that’s what came with it. If she needed time to process, then stay away until you do. That baby does not deserve that.
Welp, sucks to be Gabby. I’m sure she knows it too. And she is sticking around so I don’t feel for her.
You wanted to marry his cheating ass anyway, so why treat this baby like that?
^^^^^THIS! You had the opportunity to carry yo ass but you stayed for the ride. So you might as well throw yo luggage in the trunk with his and take that bumpy ass road trip to wherever ya’ll going, BABY IN TOW!
Who says he’s never around? How do we know that she just doesn’t post anything about him? I’d be around, let the kid be around but if I was still in a process, I probably wouldn’t be posting either.
Guess Wade still like that “Break” sex…
ALL OF THIS!
She finna WIN (in her mind) with *drumroll* 2nd Baby #2
And Everybody loses here LOL
Wade in the water children… *hums with you*
Not enough to breakup apparently.
This is the man’s fault IMB
Well
Can someone with the education come and tell us (because I don’t have it) if D Wade post this kid or even mentions him? Because he does with the other kids, and even the one he is raising that’s not his. But I never see this other one. What say you Roses? Is this baby around and in the picture or naw?
Has he ever posted a picture of this baby around the family? He has a working instagram/twitter account right?
I really think it’s the bm or D wade that keeps the baby at a distance especially if he’s still sleeping with her. I know plenty of bm that play that don’t take my kid around her mess.
I 100% agree
I agree, but that’s why I personally would have ended things with D Wade. A baby doesn’t deserve that and if I couldn’t totally accept it, AND I COULD NOT DO IT, I wouldn’t stay in the relationship.
I thought about it this way too. Then I thought how do we know it’s her keeping the child at bay? Could be Dwayne. Could be the child’s mother. I know my friend didn’t want my god daughter in family pictures with her dad and his new wife. The new wife wanted her there, and my friend said quite absolutely not…..ijs
If it’s the BM, D Wade should tae her to court. Because that’s a bunch of crap. Gabby is not he gf. She is the wife and she lives in the house. It’s sad for the kid either way.
Absolutely!
Exactly
Nakeya,
On yall show, are the two ladies pregnant by the guy?
Hoe logic.
Doesn’t have instagram or twitter… I know I’m uncool.
Why break up when he can have his cake and eat it too…he has the “movie” life with the wife and that nasty freaky life with the BM…why not keep both if you can…
But see, whoever it is, it’s not fair to the child. Why not include him or allow him to be included?! All because you, the adult are in your feelings. It’s about the kid, not you.
You ever wanted to care about something. Like really tried hard and yet NOTHING? Wade accepts her being unaccepting. I mean, she stayed so she should but she didn’t and she don’t. She ain’t ish for that. That baby gonna poison her Pepsi first chance he get.
That excuses her for being a bytch …. oh okay
That don’t make you uncool. At all.
just enough to go hit it….and then Go back home! So the chick he keep “breaking” for is setting herself up…
I couldn’t do it either. That’s a deal breaker for me especially since I can’t have any more.
Off topic: They’re bringing back dancing donkeys, as Sandra says. I’ve never seen it.
#18YearPlanX’s2
Nope. Amina is no longer pregnant. I don’t know if she got an abortion or lost it, and I am still unsure with Tara. Hopefully not, but knowing this show, yup. smh.
I agree. That child will resent Dwade and resent Gabby in the long run. He/she (can’t remember) will look back at all this internet crap and not see one picture of him/her with the “happy family”. She is less than a woman to exclude this child like this. And where is Luda’s break baby? Doesn’t he have full custody?
These guys need to take Break Baby 101 for 2 semesters at Diddy & Nem Technical Academy.
I haven’t seen one. He’s posted his two sons and his nephew (I think he’s his legal guardian) but not the baby. They both need they ass whooped. People need to start taking responsibility for their actions. You posted up in the bedroom with her and made a baby, you might as well post him on IG with the rest of your churren…
Nope. I got an IG and made one post. How many weeks ago @NakeyJ? Bout 14 weeks? Don’t have shyt else. Not uncool
WHALE, it’s been said that they aren’t legally married. Some women consider him to be a much right man.
Been there one, resulted in nothing but heartache. Had to learn but it took a long time to learn it.
Yep.
Right. Why keep leaving him out? Why do the baby like that? Yall put out Christmas cards and all that every year and the kid is no where to be seen. And if it’s the momma, then shame on her as well.
Tara posted a pic somewhere. She knocked
I forgot this part.
oh
Hussssssh, husssssssh, hussssssh, somebody’s calling my name.
I think it’s more of a keep my baby away from that bish scenario (baby momma voice). D Wade knows he messed up, so to spare his wife’s feelings, he brings baby to house when wife is away filming something. Gabrielle probably isn’t losing sleep over not seeing this child. Baby was conceived under messy circumstances, so it will take YEARS (if ever) for Gabrielle to finally come around & accept ole junior.
could be like puffy’s bm; i can’t remember her name. we didn’t see that kid until she was like 3.
Where? Lord smh. Are they considered a two parent household, since the dad lives in both places?
Wait not legally married … chile
No excuse. Think of the psychological damage she is causing this innocent child. When you marry a man, you except his baggage, break baby and all.
That’s what I think as well.
(continuing from downstairs before we were summoned up here for this :rollseyes: )
I’m on the NRA’s website
We finna learn some more history BRB 
What’s your excuse? For the psychology damage?
I must have missed that ….. lawd
I’ve seen Luda’s wife include the baby. So I will give her credit. She don’t leave any kids out.
I don’t know. …
Ask Sway down below. Him downstairs
Go home Rodger. lmfao
Baby mother of Athlete tries to pretend like his wife does not exist, but he is still married to B list actress.
They pulling a Jose and Steebie. LMAO
She posted a pic??? Where?
Chile apparently that excuses the mess chile … I guess
As a REAL woman should…
Or….
Athlete forgets about his non legal B list actress wife, still smangs his baby mother.
They had to get a test done to prove it was Diddy’s. When it came back yes, he had her with all the others. Kim did nt want that either, but that ain’t last long. Diddy keeps them kids together. I love that.
Heard Amina aborted.
*jacked
To date, the president has enacted nearly two dozen actions on gun
control. He also proposed banning M855 “green tip” ammunition earlier
this year, but backed down following the public outcry.
ROFLHAARRD!!!
Girl ……. did all that ….. and still …. chile the most
There are benefits to being legally married.
They better get on board
two parent building? I mean the share the same outside walls so that could be a household.
The PSYCHOLOGICAL damage does not excuse things forever.
I was just singing this shaking my head as a blew on it! GET OUT MY HEAD!!!
I need to go anywhay LOL!!
Jesus. *says a prayer*
Say-rah
*jacked-By Clayton E. Cramer, 1993
The Racist Roots of Gun Control
The historical record provides compelling evidence that racism underlies
gun control laws — and not in any subtle way. Throughout much of
American history, gun control was openly stated as a method for keeping
blacks and Hispanics “in their place,” and to quiet the racial fears of
whites. This paper is intended to provide a brief summary of this unholy
alliance of gun control and racism, and to suggest that gun control laws
should be regarded as “suspect ideas,” analogous to the “suspect
classifications” theory of discrimination already part of the American
legal system.
Racist arms laws predate the establishment of the United States.
Starting in 1751, the French Black Code required Louisiana colonists to
stop any blacks, and if necessary, beat “any black carrying any potential
weapon, such as a cane.” If a black refused to stop on demand, and was on
horseback, the colonist was authorized to “shoot to kill.”
[1]
Slave
possession of firearms was a necessity at times in a frontier society, yet
laws continued to be passed in an attempt to prohibit slaves or free
blacks from possessing firearms, except under very restrictively
controlled conditions.
[2]
Similarly, in the sixteenth century the colony of
New Spain, terrified of black slave revolts, prohibited all blacks, free
and slave, from carrying arms.
[3]
In the Haitian Revolution of the 1790s, the slave population
successfully threw off their French masters, but the Revolution
degenerated into a race war, aggravating existing fears in the French
Louisiana colony, and among whites in the slave states of the United
States. When the first U. S. official arrived in New Orleans in 1803 to
take charge of this new American possession, the planters sought to have
the existing free black militia disarmed, and otherwise exclude “free
blacks from positions in which they were required to bear arms,” including
such non-military functions as slave-catching crews. The New Orleans city
government also stopped whites from teaching fencing to free blacks, and
then, when free blacks sought to teach fencing, similarly prohibited their
efforts as well.
[4]
It is not surprising that the first North American English colonies,
then the states of the new republic, remained in dread fear of armed
blacks, for slave revolts against slave owners often degenerated into less
selective forms of racial warfare. The perception that free blacks were
sympathetic to the plight of their enslaved brothers, and the dangerous
example that “a Negro could be free” also caused the slave states to pass
laws designed to disarm all blacks, both slave and free. Unlike the gun
control laws passed after the Civil War, these antebellum statutes were
for blacks alone. In Maryland, these prohibitions went so far as to
prohibit free blacks from owning dogs without a license, and authorizing
any white to kill an unlicensed dog owned by a free black, for fear that
blacks would use dogs as weapons. Mississippi went further, and
prohibited any ownership of a dog by a black person.
[5]
Understandably, restrictions on slave possession of arms go back a very
long way. While arms restrictions on free blacks predate it, these
restrictions increased dramatically after Nat Turner’s Rebellion in 1831,
a revolt that caused the South to become increasingly irrational in its
fears.
[6]
Virginia’s response to Turner’s Rebellion prohibited free blacks
“to keep or carry any firelock of any kind, any military weapon, or any
powder or lead…” The existing laws under which free blacks were
occasionally licensed to possess or carry arms was also repealed, making
arms possession completely illegal for free blacks.
[7]
But even before this
action by the Virginia Legislature, in the aftermath of Turner’s
Rebellion, the discovery that a free black family possessed lead shot for
use as scale weights, without powder or weapon in which to fire it, was
considered sufficient reason for a frenzied mob to discuss summary
execution of the owner.
[8]
The analogy to the current hysteria where mere
possession of ammunition in some states without a firearms license may
lead to jail time, should be obvious.
WAAADDEEEE in da watah!!! (blows on coffee0 WAAADE in da wata children…
I would have to hear complaints directly from the child’s mother. I know some women do not want their child anywhere near the wife. The two women often behave very foolishly using the child to their own ends instead of supporting a strong relationship among the siblings.
Really! I can’t with her. I could see her being a quintessential wife of a doctor or lawyer but she’s half bird…what Gunz got coming outta that gun of his?
One example of the increasing fear of armed blacks is the 1834 change to
the Tennessee Constitution, where Article XI, 26 of the 1796 Tennessee
Constitution was revised from: “That the freemen of this State have a
right to keep and to bear arms for their common defence,”
[9]
to: “That the
free white men of this State have a right to keep and to bear arms for
their common defence.”
[10]
[emphasis added] It is not clear what motivated
this change, other than Turner’s bloody insurrection. The year before,
the Tennessee Supreme Court had recognized the right to bear arms as an
individual guarantee, but there is nothing in that decision that touches
on the subject of race.
[11]
Other decisions during the antebellum period were unambiguous about the
importance of race. In State v. Huntly (1843), the North Carolina
Supreme Court had recognized that there was a right to carry arms
guaranteed under the North Carolina Constitution, as long as such arms
were carried in a manner not likely to frighten people.
[12]
The following
year, the North Carolina Supreme Court made one of those decisions whose
full significance would not appear until after the Civil War and passage
of the Fourteenth Amendment. An 1840 statute provided:
That if any free negro, mulatto, or free person of color,
shall wear or carry about his or her person, or keep in
his or her house, any shot gun, musket, rifle, pistol,
sword, dagger or bowie-knife, unless he or she shall have
obtained a licence therefor from the Court of Pleas and
Quarter Sessions of his or her county, within one year
preceding the wearing, keeping or carrying therefor, he
or she shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and may be
indicted therefor.
[13]
Elijah Newsom, “a free person of color,” was indicted in Cumberland
County in June of 1843 for carrying a shotgun without a license — at the
very time the North Carolina Supreme Court was deciding Huntly. Newsom
was convicted by a jury; but the trial judge directed a not guilty
verdict, and the state appealed to the North Carolina Supreme Court.
Newsom’s attorney argued that the statute requiring free blacks to obtain
a license to “keep and bear arms” was in violation of both the Second
Amendment to the U. S. Constitution, and the North Carolina
Constitution’s similar guarantee of a right to keep and bear arms.
[14]
The
North Carolina Supreme Court refused to accept that the Second Amendment
was a limitation on state laws, but had to deal with the problem of the
state constitutional guarantees, which had been used in the Huntly
decision, the year before.
The 17th article of the 1776 North Carolina Constitution declared:
That the people have a right to bear arms, for the
defence of the State; and, as standing armies, in time
of peace, are dangerous to liberty, they ought not to
be kept up; and that the military should be kept under
strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil
power.
[15]
The Court asserted that: “We cannot see that the act of 1840 is in
conflict with it… The defendant is not indicted for carrying arms in
defence of the State, nor does the act of 1840 prohibit him from so
doing.”
[16]
But in Huntly, the Court had acknowledged that the restrictive
language “for the defence of the State” did not preclude an individual
right.
[17]
The Court then attempted to justify the necessity of this law:
Its only object is to preserve the peace and safety of
the community from being disturbed by an indiscriminate
use, on ordinary occasions, by free men of color, of
fire arms or other arms of an offensive character.
Self preservation is the first law of nations, as it is
of individuals.
[18]
??
I wasn’t going to point out psychology vs psychological.
Even still called it psychology damage in my response.
Didn’t want to be rude…ya dig?
Going Up da yoooondah!!!
I said this in one sentence in the last post. Guns…laws not for us. NRA=kkk
Who CARES? It’s none of Our daym Business. First of all the Baby Momma was INVISIBLE so the BABY is INVISIBLE. Why is this being an issue? So if the BABY was in PHOTOS that would mean WHAT????
Let me smang girl- smash and bang. I think I was still lurking back then, but I cried real tears while watching that video.
The North Carolina Supreme Court also sought to repudiate the idea that
free blacks were protected by the North Carolina Constitution’s Bill of
Rights by pointing out that the Constitution excluded free blacks from
voting, and therefore free blacks were not citizens. Unlike a number of
other state constitutions with right to keep and bear arms provisions that
limited this right only to citizens,
[19]
Article 17 guaranteed this right to
the people — and try as hard as they might, it was difficult to argue
that a “free person of color,” in the words of the Court, was not one of
“the people.”
It is one of the great ironies that, in much the same way that the North
Carolina Supreme Court recognized a right to bear arms in 1843 — then a
year later declared that free blacks were not included — the Georgia
Supreme Court did likewise before the 1840s were out. The Georgia Supreme
Court found in Nunn v. State (1846) that a statute prohibiting the sale
of concealable handguns, sword-canes, and daggers violated the Second
Amendment:
The right of the whole people, old and young, men,
women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear
arms of every description, and not such merely as are
used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed,
or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all of
this for the important end to be attained: the rearing
up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally
necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion
is, that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the
Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right,
originally belonging to our forefathers, trampled under
foot by Charles I. and his two wicked sons and
successors, reestablished by the revolution of 1688,
conveyed to this land of liberty by the colonists, and
finally incorporated conspicuously in our own Magna
Charta! And Lexington, Concord, Camden, River Raisin,
Sandusky, and the laurel-crowned field of New Orleans,
plead eloquently for this interpretation!
[20]
Finally, after this paean to liberty — in a state where much of the
population remained enslaved, forbidden by law to possess arms of any sort
— the Court defined the valid limits of laws restricting the bearing of
arms:
We are of the opinion, then, that so far as the act of
1837 seeks to suppress the practice of carrying certain
weapons secretly, that it is valid, inasmuch as it does
not deprive the citizen of his natural right of self-
defence, or of his constitutional right to keep and
bear arms. But that so much of it, as contains a
prohibition against bearing arms openly, is in conflict
with the Constitution, and void…
[21]
“Citizen”? Within a single page, the Court had gone from “right of the
whole people, old and young, men, women and boys” to the much more
narrowly restrictive right of a “citizen.” The motivation for this sudden
narrowing of the right appeared two years later.
The decision Cooper and Worsham v. Savannah (1848) was not, principally,
a right to keep and bear arms case. In 1839, the city of Savannah,
Georgia, in an admitted effort “to prevent the increase of free persons of
color in our city,” had established a $100 per year tax on free blacks
moving into Savannah from other parts of Georgia. Samuel Cooper and
Hamilton Worsham, two “free persons of color,” were convicted of failing
to pay the tax, and were jailed.
[22]
On appeal, counsel for Cooper and
Worsham argued that the ordinance establishing the tax was deficient in a
number of technical areas; the assertion of most interest to us is, “In
Georgia, free persons of color have constitutional rights…” Cooper and
Worsham’s counsel argued that these rights included writ of habeas corpus,
right to own real estate, to be “subject to taxation,” “[t]hey may sue and
be sued,” and cited a number of precedents under Georgia law in defense of
their position.
[23]
Justice Warner delivered the Court’s opinion, most of which is
irrelevant to the right to keep and bear arms, but one portion shows the
fundamental relationship between citizenship, arms, and elections, and why
gun control laws were an essential part of defining blacks as
“non-citizens”: “Free persons of color have never been recognized here as
citizens; they are not entitled to bear arms, vote for members of the
legislature, or to hold any civil office.”
[24]
The Georgia Supreme Court did
agree that the ordinance jailing Cooper and Worsham for non-payment was
illegal, and ordered their release, but the comments of the Court made it
clear that their brave words in Nunn v. State (1846) about “the right of
the people,” really only meant white people.
While settled parts of the South were in great fear of armed blacks, on
the frontier, the concerns about Indian attack often forced relaxation of
these rules. The 1798 Kentucky Comprehensive Act allowed slaves and free
blacks on frontier plantations “to keep and use guns, powder, shot, and
weapons, offensive and defensive.” Unlike whites, however, a license was
required for free blacks or slaves to carry weapons.
[25]
The need for blacks to carry arms for self-defense included not only the
problem of Indian attack, and the normal criminal attacks that anyone
might worry about, but he additional hazard that free blacks were in
danger of being kidnapped and sold into slavery.
[26]
A number of states,
including Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, and Wisconsin, passed laws
specifically to prohibit kidnapping of free blacks, out of concern that
the federal Fugitive Slave Laws would be used as cover for
re-enslavement.
[27]
The end of slavery in 1865 did not eliminate the problems of racist gun
control laws; the various Black Codes adopted after the Civil War required
blacks to obtain a license before carrying or possessing firearms or Bowie
knives; these are sufficiently well-known that any reasonably complete
history of the Reconstruction period mentions them. These restrictive gun
laws played a part in the efforts of the Republicans to get the Fourteenth
Amendment ratified, because it was difficult for night riders to generate
the correct level of terror in a victim who was returning fire.
[28]
It does
appear, however, that the requirement to treat blacks and whites equally
before the law led to the adoption of restrictive firearms laws in the
South that were equal in the letter of the law, but unequally enforced.
It is clear that the vagrancy statutes adopted at roughly the same time,
in 1866, were intended to be used against blacks, even though the language
was race-neutral.
[29]
The former states of the Confederacy, many of which had recognized the
right to carry arms openly before the Civil War, developed a very sudden
willingness to qualify that right. One especially absurd example, and one
that includes strong evidence of the racist intentions behind gun control
laws, is Texas.
In Cockrum v. State (1859), the Texas Supreme Court had recognized that
there was a right to carry defensive arms, and that this right was
protected under both the Second Amendment, and section 13 of the Texas
Bill of Rights. The outer limit of the state’s authority (in this case,
attempting to discourage the carrying of Bowie knives), was that it could
provide an enhanced penalty for manslaughters committed with Bowie
knives.
[30]
Yet, by 1872, the Texas Supreme Court denied that there was any
right to carry any weapon for self-defense under either the state or
federal constitutions — and made no attempt to explain or justify why the
Cockrum decision was no longer valid.
[31]
What caused the dramatic change? The following excerpt from that same
decision — so offensive that no one would dare make such an argument
today — sheds some light on the racism that apparently caused the sudden
perspective change:
The law under consideration has been attacked upon the
ground that it was contrary to public policy, and
deprived the people of the necessary means of self-
defense; that it was an innovation upon the customs and
habits of the people, to which they would not peaceably
submit… We will not say to what extent the early
customs and habits of the people of this state should
be respected and accommodated, where they may come in
conflict with the ideas of intelligent and well-meaning
legislators. A portion of our system of laws, as well
as our public morality, is derived from a people the
most peculiar perhaps of any other in the history and
derivation of its own system. Spain, at different
periods of the world, was dominated over by the
Carthagenians, the Romans, the Vandals, the Snovi, the
Allani, the Visigoths, and Arabs; and to this day there
are found in the Spanish codes traces of the laws and
customs of each of these nations blended together in a
system by no means to be compared with the sound
philosophy and pure morality of the common law.[32]
[emphasis added]
This particular decision is more open than most as to its motivations,
but throughout the South during this period, the existing precedents that
recognized a right to open carry under state constitutional provisions
were being narrowed, or simply ignored. Nor was the reasoning that led to
these changes lost on judges in the North. In 1920, the Ohio Supreme
Court upheld the conviction of a Mexican for concealed carry of a
handgun–while asleep in his own bed. Justice Wanamaker’s scathing
dissent criticized the precedents cited by the majority in defense of this
absurdity:
I desire to give some special attention to some of the
authorities cited, supreme court decisions from
Alabama, Georgia, Arkansas, Kentucky, and one or two
inferior court decisions from New York, which are given
in support of the doctrines upheld by this court. The
southern states have very largely furnished the
precedents. It is only necessary to observe that the
race issue there has extremely intensified a decisive
purpose to entirely disarm the negro, and this policy
is evident upon reading the opinions.
[33]
While not relevant to the issue of racism, Justice Wanamaker’s closing
paragraphs capture well the biting wit and intelligence of this jurist,
who was unfortunately, outnumbered on the bench:
I hold that the laws of the state of Ohio should be so
applied and so interpreted as to favor the law-abiding
rather than the law-violating people. If this decision
shall stand as the law of Ohio, a very large percentage
of the good people of Ohio to-day are criminals,
because they are daily committing criminal acts by
having these weapons in their own homes for their own
defense. The only safe course for them to pursue,
instead of having the weapon concealed on or about
their person, or under their pillow at night, is to
hang the revolver on the wall and put below it a large
placard with these words inscribed:
“The Ohio supreme court having decided that it is a
crime to carry a concealed weapon on one’s person in
one’s home, even in one’s bed or bunk, this weapon is
hung upon the wall that you may see it, and before you
commit any burglary or assault, please, Mr. Burglar,
hand me my gun.”
[34]
There are other examples of remarkable honesty from the state supreme
courts on this subject, of which the finest is probably Florida Supreme
Court Justice Buford’s concurring opinion in Watson v. Stone (1941), in
which a conviction for carrying a handgun without a permit was overturned,
because the handgun was in the glove compartment of a car:
I know something of the history of this legislation.
The original Act of 1893 was passed when there was a
great influx of negro laborers in this State drawn here
for the purpose of working in turpentine and lumber
camps. The same condition existed when the Act was
amended in 1901 and the Act was passed for the purpose
of disarming the negro laborers and to thereby reduce
the unlawful homicides that were prevalent in
turpentine and saw-mill camps and to give the white
citizens in sparsely settled areas a better feeling of
security. The statute was never intended to be applied
to the white population and in practice has never been
so applied.
[35]
Today is not 1893, and when proponents of restrictive gun control insist
that their motivations are color-blind, there is a possibility that they
are telling the truth. Nonetheless, there are some rather interesting
questions that should be asked today. The most obvious question is, “Why
should a police chief or sheriff have any discretion in issuing a
concealed handgun permit?” Here in California, even the state
legislature’s research arm–hardly a nest of pro-gunners–has admitted
that the vast majority of permits to carry concealed handguns in
California are issued to white males.
[36]
Even if overt racism is not an
issue, an official may simply have more empathy with an applicant of a
similar cultural background, and consequently be more able to relate to
the applicant’s concerns. As my wife pointedly reminded a police official
when we applied for concealed weapon permits, “If more police chiefs were
women, a lot more women would get permits, and be able to defend
themselves from rapists.”
Gun control advocates today are not so foolish as to openly promote
racist laws, and so the question might be asked what relevance the racist
past of gun control laws has. One concern is that the motivations for
disarming blacks in the past are really not so different from the
motivations for disarming law-abiding citizens today. In the last century,
the official rhetoric in support of such laws was that “they” were too
violent, too untrustworthy, to be allowed weapons. Today, the same
elitist rhetoric regards law-abiding Americans in the same way, as
child-like creatures in need of guidance from the government. In the last
century, while never openly admitted, one of the goals of disarming blacks
was to make them more willing to accept various forms of economic
oppression, including the sharecropping system, in which free blacks were
reduced to an economic state not dramatically superior to the conditions
of slavery.
In the seventeenth century, the aristocratic power structure of colonial
Virginia found itself confronting a similar challenge from lower class
whites. These poor whites resented how the men who controlled the
government used that power to concentrate wealth into a small number of
hands. These wealthy feeders at the government trough would have disarmed
poor whites if they could, but the threat of both Indian and pirate attack
made this impractical; for all white men “were armed and had to be
armed…” Instead, blacks, who had occupied a poorly defined status
between indentured servant and slave, were reduced to hereditary chattel
slavery, so that poor whites could be economically advantaged, without the
upper class having to give up its privileges.
[37]
Today, the forces that push for gun control seem to be heavily (though
not exclusively) allied with political factions that are committed to
dramatic increases in taxation on the middle class. While it would be
hyperbole to compare higher taxes on the middle class to the suffering and
deprivation of sharecropping or slavery, the analogy of disarming those
whom you wish to economically disadvantage, has a certain worrisome
validity to it.
Another point to consider is that in the American legal system, certain
classifications of governmental discrimination are considered
constitutionally suspect, and these “suspect classifications” (usually
considered to be race and religion) come to a court hearing under a strong
presumption of invalidity. The reason for these “suspect classifications”
is because of the long history of governmental discrimination based on
these classifications, and because these classifications often impinge on
fundamental rights.
[38]
In much the same way, gun control has historically been a tool of
racism, and associated with racist attitudes about black violence.
Similarly, many gun control laws impinge on that most fundamental of
rights: self-defense. Racism is so intimately tied to the history of gun
control in America that we should regard gun control aimed at law-abiding
people as a “suspect idea,” and require that the courts use the same
demanding standards when reviewing the constitutionality of a gun control
law, that they would use with respect to a law that discriminated based on
race.
I know and I sawED what you did. He must have helped Mama Jones with her t shirts?
Not Mama Jones
Shouts out to @His. Lawd they was crazy with smang
Full bird. She hasn’t seen the power in moving on. Feels like she’s got too much invested. At least all her kids will have the same daddy so they can potentially be matches for each other if needed.
Amina supposedly got rid of it when she found out Tara was pregnant. Haven’t watched in 3 weeks BUT how you getting an abortion but not a divorce? *sits chin on hands and waits*
I was thinking about them last night. That was best LHHNY line up. No hit Olivia. Jim and Chrissy. Yandy when she had sense. Mama Jones. Jules and Kimbella. Damn Emily Bustamante. Rich Dollars when he was likeable
Thank you for pointing out my error. I wasn’t attempting to justify Gabby’s behavior, merely explain it.
LMBO. If I could get inside Cissy’s head for one day, I know I would find some gems.
AND I just got off the the “Second Amendment Foundation” website.
My goodness!
Bird logic. I have had some fawked up situations but they were private. You living this shyt out on tv for a dayum check and you still have no motivation to ‘do right or ack right’?
Oftentimes, when people live through trauma, they lose the ability to empathize with others.
It’s a mess. Huge. SON hope you had a blessed Christmas and an eventful new year.
YES. So many gems in that line up. Kumbella hair on fire? *I’m still pretty* foot to face *I’m still cute tho* chrissy to Somaya Reece *look at your shoes* Jim making Somaya manager apologize ?. Aww man. So much more.
It could actually be that the mom has a history of drama in relationships. …her other children are from Damon Wayans Jr. …and that didn’t end well…she had a habit of creeping…ijs
Thanks dear & likewise!
BUT more importantly EYE wanna see you on Fri. Feb5th! Apollo Theater
Check it out :2dance:
What people failed to realize is that although shes not a superstar and not that classy and to be honest not that pretty, the break baby’s mother has a serious hold on Wade. Wade likes that woman, a lot, and that why he got her pregnant. Because he likes her. If she was just some one time side piece he knocked up and meant nothing to him, Gabby would have accepted the kid. Its not the kid, she cant stand Wade’s passion for the break baby mama.
This can be so many athlete’s that its comical….
To be with my Lord *mc hammer version*
Has NEVER posted him or mentioned him in a post. Talks about the other 3 constantly…so it’s NOT just Gabby doesn’t accept the baby or the bm doesn’t want the baby posted. The bm supposedly posts the baby. D Wade acts like he doesnt exist on social media…
Wasn’t that Somaya chick in there somewhere? LOL Whatever happened to her or her music. The last I seen of her she was on L.A. Hair getting a dye job.
you are absolutely right here. Some people have no backbone when it comes to their children. I will never understand it. Its unnatural not to stand up for your child. But I think leaving the child out was a part of their Gabby forgive and Wade make up for it engagement and marital arrangement.
Let me wait right with you. Because so you won’t have the baby, but you will have the cheating man? The “logic” these people use is retarded.
This
Interesting name
SO hmmmmm, you look like my man OR rap like him?
Your fearless leader is crying like a little girl on national television. ISIS is laughing at us!
Its one thing for her to not accept the child in private. But she publicly shames and brands the child as an outsider which is downright mean. And shes a hypocrite because she validates herself in the mother role by using his ex wifes children but erases the break baby. Twisted.
Obviously …. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/c413043aaa3ea43e88ac8c299ded2ec5f3ac3e5b1f7355a33edcca380e206f06.gif
Her pu$$y wasn’t invisible

Thanks and smh
Can someone please watch that Zoe Ever After show so the ad will go away?
OK cool. Please keep in contact. I will forget or have other things. I’m in ?
Her too. Yes.?
LMAO! That’s hilarious! ?
Lord, shyt everywhere.
The lil Itty bitty man.
Chrissy about Somaya TEETH.
Never cared for him after his 1st childrens Grandmother said she helped take care of him through high school and some college and how he acting like they never existed.. You know if you have no Respect for someone who feed you, your not going to have respect for your wife.. ETC HUMp
It doesn’t come on till tonight …. and yes I’m watching
Well I’m not alone. I used to have a twitter acct. Posted one tweet and deleted it. I don’t even know what the screen name was.
Will do! I just got my flights together yesterday, just trying to figure out where I wanna stay LOL
I’ll text you in a couple weeks with more info.
True indeed
*grabs yo hand and talks through clenched teeth* STOP IT!
I bet it is !
Or put out a CD
My stepmother said to me 20+ years ago ‘yo azz is apart of his past and your azz need to remain there’ and that is exactly how she has & still treats me since she came into the picture 5 years after my mom & pops split up. (I’ve never cared what she thought of me…:0)
She stole him from Siovaughnn. Now the BM stole him from her. That BM ain’t going nowhere.
As soon as you get details let me know. I can get brunch etc together
I never believed everything about Siofdajnviera. Talmbout she gave him an STD and such. Nah, you found out before her and took care of it before she even knew.
*jacked CNN
Now, following a new clutch of killings in places like Oregon, South Carolina and California last year, Obama’s public evolution on gun control may be complete. Instead of talking, he’s acting.
On Tuesday, wiping away tears as he spoke of children killed in Connecticut in 2012, Obama unveiled a series of executive actions on guns, including expanding mandatory background checks for some private sales.
“We are not inherently more prone to violence. But we are the only advanced country on Earth that sees this kind of mass violence erupt with this kind of frequency. It doesn’t happen in other advanced countries. It’s not even close,” Obama said at the White House. “Somehow we become numb to it and we start to feel that this is normal. And instead of thinking about how to solve the problem, this has become one of our most polarized, partisan debates, despite the fact that there’s a general consensus in America about what needs to be done.”
He added, “We do have to feel a sense of urgency about it. In Dr. King’s
words, we need to feel the fierce urgency of now — because people are
dying.”
What the what? I can’t believe she fixed her mouth to say that to you. I try to respect my elders, but I know, “Biiiiish,…” would’ve come out of my mouth so fast.
Never considered this. Hmm
RIGHT! All this “music” the people on these shows do and WHO other than K.Michelle, has an album out?! WHO
He will also press for public support on the issue at a live town hall meeting hosted by CNN on Thursday night –making gun violence a priority of his final year in office, days before his valedictory State of the Union address.
Obama insisted Tuesday that he merely wants to enact a few common-sense gun safety measures. But the gun lobby is mobilizing and Republicans, led by 2016 front-runner Donald Trump, insist Obama is out to make it impossible for people to buy guns.
How do you know they’re laughing at us?
I read this like 4 times trying to see what’s wrong with the crying for the children came in at. smdh.
crying over dead kids is a problem for you? You have real issues sir. Who hurt you?
LOL !
Exactly, I guess her PUSSY is attracted to DW’s with $$$. Dwayne WADE and Damon Wayans jr BUT no MARRIAGE.
Your dad has said nothing about her treating you this way? He’s still with her?
How long is the process? How was she able to get over it and marry him so quickly? Especially when he was the one that did wrong by her?
Some folks just enjoy being
or acting
for no reason
&
(together) LOL
Americans were laughing at him; it stands to reason that our enemies were doubled over in hysteria.
I still cry about them kids when I think about it. It was hard for me when it happened cause my son was almost 2. Now that he is in school, I cannot even imagine!
It means that I kick knowledge (rap) like him – but I’m a woman and I go harder…
Why in the heck NOBODY told me there was a new post… this post is not even a new post anymore according to the amount of comments. Lol…
Who would laugh over someone showing grief over dead children? WHO?
I concur
YOU GO GIRL!
Good luck. Best wishes!
I just saw this on IG ?
Ok so lunch friend comes to my desk cuz he knows Im fasting from meat and stuff this month..hands me a bag of Wasabi Ranch..Snapea Crisps. I take one bite of one and was like..
She actually is the one that said he gave her the STD and in court it came out that he didn’t.
Must be a part of ISIS with his ignorant azz!!! :cranberryjuice:
Heeyyyy…look who made it up! (in my Kevin Hart voice)
I don’t believe that he didn’t give it to her. He probably took care of it before she found out she was infected.
We gone get you on EMPIRE!!!
How long is she going to pretend she’s happy? She’s miserable and insecure and she probably makes him pay everyday for that break baby…
I’m not surprised.
(If this is true) I’m sure BM is planning on baby #2.
I have an uncle that had a baby on his WIFE…when he was in his 50s….his wife (who stole him away from his FIRST wife)…won’t even let the lil boy in the house. My uncle initially SWORE the young chick was lying..the baby wasn’t his..but guess what the DNA said?
Anyway, Gabby reminds me of my uncles 2nd wife.
Really… You just gone embarrass a sista like that?!!!
it doesn’t even happen this much in “underdeveloped” countries.
So (Forcing Fathers to be at least financially responsible for their actions) didn’t make the cut huh?!!! :cranberryjuice:
No diss, but you Uncle ain’t shyt to allowing his wife to treat the kid like that. smfh.
Apparently him #smh
He is pulling a Bill Clinton and is going to pass a whole lot of stuff on his way out. Oh, how I remember those days….Bill had us pretty comfortable.
Herpes ain’t curable. All the court records were all over the Internet. The dude she cheated with testified she gave him money and her cousin did too.
Yeah and not paying child support is
Forcing mothers and children to become homeless
Forcing mothers to work 23 jobs to take up his slack which causes the child to be left alone to its own devices while mom is out trying to feed the child
Emotionally draining on the mother who is playing the role of both parents.
Forcing mothers to wish the ninja would just die so the kid could at least get some insurance money
FOH..only weak azz fathers use that excuse sooryy azz…Get off that woa is me bullshyt. 33% comes out your check per child..100% of our income goes to the household what the fuk is the problem again?
Nope.
CTHU……Imma watch it just for you!
Chile is that … that pooch azz in the air gal chile …. how you just brang yo tail in here like that rofl dead
Bet money this is from some dead beat ass father. Bye sir.
Heyyyyyyyyyy Keke!!!
No diss taken..lol. No he ain’t sh*t, I co-sign. I could write a book on how rachet his arse is…but the current wife got EXACTLY what she deserved. Now he’s damn near infirm and she has to (pretend to) lovingly take care of him. *spit*
*screamin*
JenEEEE…bahahahahaaaaa
Who Future and Lil Duval pay to post this?
LOLOLOL!!!
Nope and ain’t gonna make this particular list.
This my deddy and his new lady too. She told him to cut our grown asses off and moved his ass from TN to Hawaii and changed his phone number. He texts on holidays, but we haven’t spoken since. Mind you even as a grown ass woman, me and my father played tennis and went to dinner ATLEAST once a week until she came in the pictcha. But i figure if he let her treat me and my sibs like that, oh the fawk well.
You betta preach Wuts…
I’m a bit confused by this. How is CS “forcing fathers into unemployment”?
Chile I read all the way to the end of that non-sensical b/s..looking for a punch line…
Cuz…them no good bastids would rather QUIT their jobs..than pay.
You a hot mess … rofl
And this is why I support locking them the hell up. Triflent. Lil Duval was just on IG talking about they should take away Child Support. smdh. He is a super clown.
So they are choosing to be unemployed? Oh ok.. Don’t say anything forced you. YOU quit. Tuh. I know someone like that right damn now. Mind you, he don’t want to pay CS for his two kids, but lives with another woman and HER two kids. smfh
Soulless, ignorant azzed Americans were laughing at him. Speak for your crew only.
That sounds like it would have made a good as Paternity Court show!!! Lol…
New post- Knocked up Draya.
I have watched enough Fatal Vows, Wives with Knives, and Snapped to know that you need to hear his voice ASAP. His wife could be running a ruse like Dee Dee Moore was doing in regards to Abraham Shakespeare
Well they can’t even play that game here in GA.. They lock yo azz up on CS in Cobb County..they sending your azz straight to work release.. You will work until your arrears are paid down.. then you can leave BUT you have 30 days to find work don’t care if it washing windows on the side of the road.. or its back to Work Release for you… I ain’t even mad at that..
Girl I know a dude with FIVE kids that refuses to work because they would garnish his wages. But let him tell it…his baby mammas FORCED him to quit. If they’d get off his back about child support he could work.
My DVR is set to watch Zoe Ever After (because I have to watch the THATHN)… BUT if the first show do not make the cut… I will not be recording any more episodes…
@F**k Folks 2016
New Post: just for you !
Was he helping to take care of the 5 kids before he was put on child support? If not then sir, you forced them to do it. and you quit so you would not have to.
I ain’t know it was herpes! I don’t know why I thought it was gonorrhea.
Dead ^^^^ LMAO !!!
Not mad at that at all. If you know that’s what will happen, then guess what? PAY THE CHILD SUPPORT.
It is some sorry men in this world… #smh
Nope he wasn’t. But steady posting pics talking about how much he loves his kids.
Sorry…just sorry.
Yep there was a time where my ex would work “Under the Table” to make money until they locked his azz up. He told the judge he hasn’t had a job..the judge asked. “Well when you were working how much were you making? ” He said “Oh i had a goood job before all this making potientially $15hr.” Judge said oh yeah well we gone just go by your “Potiential” and made him pay 33% of 15hr.. and told him he had 30 days to come up with all the arrears.
Please Gabby knows this one is different. No matter how I feel about Gabby(not good feelings…) she seems to be a woman who will accept her man’s kids…but this one is different, this one’s mom got a hold emotionally on her husband…this one didn’t happen on a break, this one will be the one not spoken of.
hahahhaaaaaaaa….
*hugs* Hey Wutty Butty
I told my ex alllll i wanted from him was to make sure his kids never ran out of shoes for their feet and diapers. Every now and then if i needed help on a bill come through.. he couldn’t do that sew… “Uhh yah honor sir uuuh…”
Nailed it!
Those ear to ear grins gabby (alien face) be trying to pull off ain’t foolin me, that girl is unhappy!
I agree, her true colors are definitely showing and it also proves by her ignoring this child that he wasn’t no “break baby”!
Did Obama get on TV and cry over the children he murdered with his drones?
I found it on a pro black page, but you’re so right. ?
WTF does that have to do with him crying over these kids, and you trying to act like he should not cry?
The enemies are right here in the good ole UNTIED (no typo) States of AmeriKKKa. Wake up!
LOL! ?
LOL! ?
Zackly… better yet do what you posed to do so the woman wont feel the need to get the folks involved. Help with the upkeep.. come get them and spend time with them etc…
Zackly… better yet do what you posed to do so the woman wont feel the need to get the folks involved. Help with the upkeep.. come get them and spend time with them etc…
Jenie..that mess was Horrrible! I almost spit it out in his face..
Jenie..that mess was Horrrible! I almost spit it out in his face..
People are overdoing it. Yes, everyone can see she’s ignoring the kid that’s not a product of their marriage….tho he had his sons way before he met her. My point is her ignoring the baby is a good thing!!
Tbh I wouldn’t trust her around it. She may pretend to be nice but be like an evil step mom as the baby gets older. Some people are bitter and can Idk cruel things. I’m sure Dwayne makes sure his kid has EVERYTHING. Let the baby be happy with it’s Mom. How old is the kid anyway, can he/she talk? I don’t want someone pinching my child and saying he/she crying because of blah blah blah.
People are overdoing it. Yes, everyone can see she’s ignoring the kid that’s not a product of their marriage….tho he had his sons way before he met her. My point is her ignoring the baby is a good thing!!
Tbh I wouldn’t trust her around it. She may pretend to be nice but be like an evil step mom as the baby gets older. Some people are bitter and can Idk cruel things. I’m sure Dwayne makes sure his kid has EVERYTHING. Let the baby be happy with it’s Mom. How old is the kid anyway, can he/she talk? I don’t want someone pinching my child and saying he/she crying because of blah blah blah.
Blame the daddy.
Blame the daddy.
You made a really really good point. Never looked at it from that angle. Just saw her as petty for hating a child.
You made a really really good point. Never looked at it from that angle. Just saw her as petty for hating a child.
I have a friend with a similar situation and her pops and mom had been separated. Like over 10+ years. Her step mom will not include her in anything and dare her sisters and brothers to tell her about family photos ops or family functions. But her dad will call her and invite her to things
I have a friend with a similar situation and her pops and mom had been separated. Like over 10+ years. Her step mom will not include her in anything and dare her sisters and brothers to tell her about family photos ops or family functions. But her dad will call her and invite her to things
How can you be problack but against doing right by the child you help create? Granted there are some men who do right and WANT to see their kids etc and the mother ain’t shyt.. but most women who are forced to make the father pay just to stay afloat…I ain’t got no love for those dudes..
How can you be problack but against doing right by the child you help create? Granted there are some men who do right and WANT to see their kids etc and the mother ain’t shyt.. but most women who are forced to make the father pay just to stay afloat…I ain’t got no love for those dudes..
Could very well be she doesn’t want her child in or around Gabby…Does said baby mama have a gag order, haven’t heard a peep out of her.
Could very well be she doesn’t want her child in or around Gabby…Does said baby mama have a gag order, haven’t heard a peep out of her.
You all blaming Gabby for ignoring the kid when Dwayne is to blame. Personally I see it as a good thing. I wouldn’t trust her with my kid, people can be bitter and spiteful. I’m sure Dwayne schedules time to see him/her and makes sure his kid has everything!! Don’t overlook the baby momma. She may be the messy type. I wouldn’t have anything to do with the kid because the Mom may accuse me of mistreating her child. That’s not a good look and the media would run with the story and it could cause more problems with Dwayne and Gabby. Gabby is playing it safe, sometimes we can’t see the method to someone’s madness but it’s there.
You all blaming Gabby for ignoring the kid when Dwayne is to blame. Personally I see it as a good thing. I wouldn’t trust her with my kid, people can be bitter and spiteful. I’m sure Dwayne schedules time to see him/her and makes sure his kid has everything!! Don’t overlook the baby momma. She may be the messy type. I wouldn’t have anything to do with the kid because the Mom may accuse me of mistreating her child. That’s not a good look and the media would run with the story and it could cause more problems with Dwayne and Gabby. Gabby is playing it safe, sometimes we can’t see the method to someone’s madness but it’s there.
Not surprised. D Wade’s baby mom had been everyone’s side piece tho.
Not surprised. D Wade’s baby mom had been everyone’s side piece tho.
Well baby mama said Dwyane is a great father and spends time and provide for their child so….
Hey WHANGDANGDOODLE (kiss)
I hope not cause that babies mom’s wasn’t to attractive..when I had my break baby it was with a mediocre chick who love chewing balls and getting nutted in..watch the traps fellas
Deep!!!!!!!
He always has to me, I was shocked to find out his real age
Chile please…even in Church 1 Sunday I sat in the pew right behind him and his family at Peace Offering time she gave them all the ‘do even turn the f— around look’ not 1 of the 6 them turned round to shake my hand including him. It was kind of symbolic for me. I left that relationship right there at the alter and have been a peace every since many years ago.:0)
Sadly for them it has not slowed us down one bit Bess!…:0)
And they don’t realize.. what one endures only makes one stronger…:0)
None of this is Gabbys fault! Just shows how much of a weak POS Wade is – that’s HIS CHILD. IF this is Gabby – what kind of man is he to allow it? I think its the bitter baby mama that is trying to “flex” by keeping the baby away and Gabby gives ZERO ph ucks.
I totally agree! Baby mama is on the outside looking in and wants the baby “outside” right along with her. Even if she is still sleeping with Wade, at the end of the day she is/was only good enough to screw but not wife. Unfortunately for the baby, the baby mama is making the child settle like she HAS/HAD to.
Another well kept woman
I don’t blame Gabby.. I wonder if she can reproduce, certain men need this in their life
Dead…how is that a trap? Last time I checked…sperm meets egg = baby.
I thought she said her career came first…or maybe that was someone else…
I’d do the same BUT karma did get her ass as she stole him from someone else. I’d be damn if my husband brought another child around me and mines. IF I decided to stay I’d tell him to pay the child support and that’s it. But I’d leave just off the fact he put my health at risk….
Lol hurry it up along and get that insurance and hopefully social security
What career?? Reality shows??
Yeah, must be someone else
Is she getting money from Wade? She is. By agreement, he is entitled to have the child in his home at least for half the time. He is still an infant and Wade travels a lot which may be the reason the mother may have not sent the child to Miami to spend time with Wade.
I agree. Imagine if something happens to that child while in Miami. Also, Wade will be within distance of the mother beaches the kid is still so young. If I were him, I would buy a condo in LA and have the nannies bring the child over. No need to interact with the mama at all.
Lol dead…she got SOMETHING… bish make a whole lot more than I do that’s for sure and works a whole lot less lol
I don’t think the pro black page is advocating don’t take care of your kid, but do it in your own & keep the “man” out of it.
I got these BBQ peas that are bomb…have to get some more for sure
Lol me too I’m like huh!?!
She can pretend all she want but she accepted the apology proposal so guess what boo boo yews that baby step mammy too
Sounds about right
That’s sad! It’s good that you’ve made your peace with the situation and not allowed it to affect your life going forward.
LOL. See my comment below.
Makes sense @TheRealLee
Thanks SG!
They are the snapeas? the wasabi isn’t good..
Then he needed to stay out the puzzy then.. if thats the case…
Pun intended?
Halleloooooooyeeeerrrrr!!! *praise twerks*
World peas Texas bbq….green peas
Know your worth is what Mom told me now I may have not listened in my 20’s but 40’s yes I’ve learned. The baby if true is innocent. Dwyane not at all.
Gabby made a major sacrifice marrying Wade after the break baby. Gabby was to have Wade’s next child. The break baby’s mama has what Gabby doesn’t and possibly may never have- Wade’s child.
I don’t wish heartbreak on anyone. Gabby is hurting and slighting the break baby and pretending Wade’s first wife’s children are her own seems to make her feel better.
But Gabby is party to taking a wife and mother’s children away and that is a heartbreak far worse than her man having a break baby.
Sounds right to me.
Uh hah uh ha but she ain’t wifey. Liking and marrying are two separate things. He like the sex but won’t wife it. Sooooooo she only a good fck!
When I see Gabbie posting pics with his sons, minus the break baby, I want to ask her so bad wth is the other son? I give she and Wade 3 more years tops.
What if his mind/heart is on the other side of town with the “ain’t wifey” and he tolerates and wifed his wife because he “messed up”?
Is there a marriage license on file yet
I think she said she can’t because she was raped
She should include him and be as open to a relationship as possible. She is playing mama to his sons and a nephew already, so she can do it. It’s NOT The Child’s Fault his daddy gets around or his step mom is petty to a child. Sad part is she will take all of wade’s crap because he extended her 15 minutes and took her from d list to b list. Always knew she was a self centered mean girl…
I don’t think so. SM1 pulled my coattail on this fact a couple months ago. My slow behind thinking all cuz there was a wedding, they must be “married.”
and something is eating at me about Wade having an average peen. Now, veteran readers of SR know I’m not a size queen, but one must wonder with concern.
Probably me lol been asking for months. One of the other blogs said it’s nothing in IL, CA, or FL and it’s public record
Nope, and I am happily married. The baby mama has a hold on him. I knew it was going to happen. She never should have married him. That was a marriage for the stability of there images. Gabriel is very territorial and competitive. He knows it, she should have left him
They still married. Baby mama still a side piece. Just like Jay he married bey but love Rihanna. Same shit.
Wowwwww…now that’s deep
I read a blind yesterday that said Dade is still creeping with the mother of the break baby.
thought it was a mistake like the nia and chris brown sitch
????
Ouch!
MAYBE SHE CANT HAVE KIDS???
PREACH #YOUREAPWHATYOUSOE
2FOR1….WAKES YOU UP AND CLEANSES YOU OUT AT THE SAME DAMN TIME!!
Wade is not faithful at all. When he would be at the Chicago Bears games i was at , he would always be in some girl’s face. He tried to talk to my sister. Gabby looks like she’s the ultimate bitch anyway. She probably runs him off anyway.
Yupp, her and Lauren London was screwing this man while he was with the first wife. I heard Lauren left because she found out about Gabby.
Those Hollywood skanks are something else .
Lauren London is like a door knob. Everyone has had a turn with her. Whenever I see her “acting” all I can think is what a slut.
Stick a fork in me I’m done!!! Lmao
The kid didn’t ask to be here. This makes me dislike her.
Dang. Maybe that’s why
STANDING OVATION……….Preach!